Is What’s Driving Bitcoin’s Rise Any Different From the “WallStreetBets” Phenomenon?

Here’s why I think the price of Bitcoin could be a different (but similar) kind of market manipulation to the short squeezes we’ve seen play out of late!

Big Bitcoin logo.

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

Cryptocurrencies are certainly interesting to write about. That said, Bitcoin has probably lost its place as the most speculative way to invest right now. We’ve got a new game in town called a short squeeze.

In this article, I’m going to talk about thinly traded assets and short squeezes. I’m going to try to tie together the parabolic stock price increases we’ve seen of late with what we’ve seen for a long time in cryptocurrencies.

Why a stock’s float and trading volume matter

A stock’s float refers to the percentage of its total shares that are available to be bought or sold. At any given time, a certain percentage of stock can be locked up. Whether this is in the form of restricted executive compensation or just the fact that long-term investors have held onto said stock for so long that it’s effectively off the market, only a certain percentage of any given company’s stock actually trades every day. Some companies will have a very small float.

Thinly traded stocks are those with few buyers and sellers on a given day. The “bid-ask” spread on these stocks can often be much higher than those with tremendous volume that are more accurately priced.

In the case of the targets the Reddit “WallStreetBets” group has gone after, these have typically been thinly traded, low-volume stocks that have a high percentage of the outstanding float shorted. In a recent article, I described what short-selling and what a short squeeze are. For those who’d like to learn more about these phenomena, I’d highly recommend reading it.

Essentially, the WallStreetBets group has targeted stocks that have been heavily shorted and initiated a squeeze. They’ve forced the price up by buying up so much of the float that short-sellers have to buy back their positions at market prices (which have skyrocketed). This has caused massive losses for short-sellers but has also added more fuel to the fire. As short-sellers cover their positions, they’re buying more stock on the open market. This continues the parabolic upward move we’ve witnessed in so many of these stocks, such as BlackBerry recently.

Bitcoin’s rise could be quite similar in many respects

One of the common theories around why the price of Bitcoin has gone so parabolic in recent years centres on another theoretical finance concept. This is not likely an asset that has been “squeezed.” Rather, some think that large holders of Bitcoin (whales) have “painted the tape” with digital currencies.

What this means is that a small float of Bitcoin could be traded among whales to prop the price up over time. Think of a stock with 1,000 shares. If three individuals own 950 shares and decide to hold these forever, only 50 will ever trade. If one whale decides to sell 50 of his 950 shares to the next for $1 more, the price of that stock will have to increase. This could be repeated continuously in a circle, with the increased cost each time only $50. However, each whale will see their portfolio jump in excess of $300 each and every time a transaction occurs.

Since it’s widely believed so many of the early crypto adopters own a large percentage of the outstanding Bitcoin, this is a realistic explanation of how these assets could be manipulated higher. Furthermore, since we don’t know who’s buying or selling these digital currencies, it’s impossible to know what’s going on in terms of daily transactions. If anything, the stage is perfectly set for the tape to be painted. Of course, this is all just speculation.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Chris MacDonald has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends BlackBerry and BlackBerry.

More on Investing

Investing

KM Throwaway Post

Read more »

Investing

Carlos Test Yoast Metadata

Read more »

Investing

KM Ad Test

This is my excerpt.

Read more »

Investing

Test post for affiliate partner mockups

Updated: 9/17/2024. This post was not sponsored. The views and opinions expressed in this review are purely those of the…

Read more »

Investing

Testing Ecap Error

Premium content from Motley Fool Stock Advisor We here at Motley Fool Stock Advisor believe investors should own at least…

Read more »

Investing

TSX Today: Testing the Ad for James

la la la dee dah.

Read more »

Lady holding remote control pointed towards a TV
Investing

2 Streaming Stocks to Buy Now and 1 to Run From

There are streaming stocks on the TSX that are worth paying attention to in 2023 and beyond.

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Stocks for Beginners

Top Recession-Resilient TSX Stocks to Buy With $3,000

It's time to increase your exposure to defensives!

Read more »