2 Ways the CRA Could Ask You for the $14,000 CERB Back

The CERB is over and replaced by the EI and the CRB to some extent, but the CRA hasn’t given up on tracking down fraudulent recipients and asking back the relief payment.

| More on:
Knowledge concept with quote written on wooden blocks

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

The CERB has been over for a while now, and it’s replaced with the EI and the CRB primarily, which are comparatively more demanding (by design). The concept behind discounting the CERB and replacing it with other benefit payments was to nudge people into action and, in a way, force them to rejoin the workforce and restart the economy.

The CERB was very lenient, and as a consequence, many people opted for receiving the easy benefit payment instead of turning to hard work and restarting their jobs. The EI and the CRB are a bit more discerning and relatively short-tenured. They are expected to ensure that people would expand every effort they possibly can to find a job instead of delaying in favor or receiving benefit payments.

But just because the CERB is over doesn’t mean that the CRA has forgotten that many ineligible recipients received the CERB benefit. The people are encouraged to send their CERB payments back voluntarily. If that doesn’t work, the department might start penalizing people. Two of the ways the CRA can ask for a part (or full) amount of your CERB back are:

CRA’s piece of the pie

The CERB was not tax-free. Unlike the current CRB that’s taxed at the source, the whole $2,000 a month CERB amount was released to the recipients. They are supposed to add this payment to their taxable income and pay the relevant amount of the $14,000 CERB back to the CRA. The amount would vary with your tax bracket.

Unqualified recipients

Whether you did it by mistake or knowingly lied to the CRA to receive the CERB benefits, if you don’t qualify, you might have to pay the CERB back, maybe all of it. It can be a problem for people who don’t have a sizeable amount stashed away. You need to pay back the CERB because you didn’t qualify but still received and used it and later realized your mistake.

Even if you can’t pay back the full amount at once, you need to reach out to the CRA and discuss an arrangement that works for you.

Self-grown benefit payment

If you qualified for the CERB and only received payments for periods when you were eligible, you might be in the clear. Still, a much safer option than the benefit payment would have been to rely on your own, self-grown funds, that is, your TFSA nest eggs. If you want to create one for any future financial disasters, one stock you may want to consider is TFI International (TSX:TFII).

It’s a transport and logistics company that saw its business and its stock price grow quite rapidly during the pandemic. Its year-to-date returns are 52.2%, and if you had bought the stock when it cratered in March, you’d now have grown your stake in the company by 171%. It’s not brutally over expensive right now, but the prudent thing to do would for a dip in the stock.

Foolish takeaway

Even if you don’t have to send back the whole $14,000, you will have to pay taxes on any CERB payments you have received. This is another area where the TFSA funds are better since they don’t come with a tax obligation.

You should apply for government benefits when you are eligible, but that shouldn’t be your only route when you are in a financial crisis.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Adam Othman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

More on Dividend Stocks

growing plant shoots on stacked coins
Dividend Stocks

5 Dividend Stocks to Buy With Yields Upwards of 5%

These five companies all earn tonnes of cash flow, making them some of the best long-term dividend stocks you can…

Read more »

funds, money, nest egg
Dividend Stocks

TFSA Investors: 3 Stocks to Start Building an Influx of Passive Income

A TFSA is the ideal registered account for passive income, as it doesn't weigh down your tax bill, and any…

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Dividend Stocks

3 of the Safest Dividend Stocks in Canada

Royal Bank of Canada stock is one of the safest TSX dividend stocks to buy. So is CT REIT and…

Read more »

Growing plant shoots on coins
Dividend Stocks

1 of the Top Canadian Growth Stocks to Buy in February 2023

Many top Canadian growth stocks represent strong underlying businesses, healthy financials, and organic growth opportunities.

Read more »

stock research, analyze data
Dividend Stocks

Wherever the Market Goes, I’m Buying These 3 TSX Stocks

Here are three TSX stocks that could outperform irrespective of the market direction.

Read more »

woman data analyze
Dividend Stocks

1 Oversold Dividend Stock (Yielding 6.5%) to Buy This Month

Here's why SmartCentres REIT (TSX:SRU.UN) is one top dividend stock that long-term investors should consider in this current market.

Read more »

IMAGE OF A NOTEBOOK WITH TFSA WRITTEN ON IT
Dividend Stocks

Better TFSA Buy: Enbridge Stock or Bank of Nova Scotia

Enbridge and Bank of Nova Scotia offer high yields for TFSA investors seeking passive income. Is one stock now undervalued?

Read more »

Golden crown on a red velvet background
Dividend Stocks

2 Top Stocks Just Became Canadian Dividend Aristocrats

These two top Canadian Dividend Aristocrats stocks are reliable companies with impressive long-term growth potential.

Read more »