CAUTION: 2 Ways the CRA Can Take Back Your $14,000 CERB!

CERB wasn’t a “free-for-all” payout as many people considered it to be. It was supposed to be for the worst economic-sufferers of the pandemic.

| More on:
Mature financial advisor showing report to young couple for their investment

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

CERB has been extended for another week, so people who haven’t been able to find viable jobs or restarted their business at enough capacity can have one more month to replace lost income. The government isn’t planning to leave them stranded, but the EI that’s supposed to replace CERB isn’t going to be as generous for many recipients nor easy to qualify for.

With a bigger CERB comes even more responsibility. For eligible recipients, it means a bigger tax bill. For ones that didn’t qualify but circumvented the system and got the CERB anyway, the $14,000 CERB might become a very strong noose once CRA asks for the money back.

There are two ways that CRA can take your money back.

If you lied on your CERB application

If you lied on your CERB application and were dishonest about the details you had to fill in, you might have to pay the piper. For now, a penalty hasn’t been finalized for cheating on CERB applications, and the most CRA would do, is ask for the amount (that a fraudulent recipient was receiving) back. The full amount can reach $14,000.

But since it will most likely happen in the next tax season, the government might come up with some sort of punishment. It might be justified because taking unjustified CERB isn’t just about getting your hands on some government money, but you might also be preventing someone who deserved this sum from getting the money.

If you got a job but still kept receiving CERB

If you found a job or another way to replace lost income that disqualified you for CERB, you need to send that month’s CERB back. But if you keep earning and receiving CERB, CRA can take the money back. It’s tracing fraudulent cases by comparing them to payrolls, but it might take some time. Eventually, it will catch up, and if it decides to penalize you, you may end up paying more than just the original $14,000.

Your own CERB

If you had invested a small amount in the right company at the right time, you’d have a decent-sized nest egg to sustain you and work as a replacement for your CERB. For example, if you had invested just $1,000 in Enghouse Systems (TSX:ENGH) – the oldest tech aristocrat, about nine years back, you’d have about $19,000 right now.

TFSA was also around back then, and the investment would have been even more lucrative in a TFSA. Because in the registered account, the growth and your withdrawals to make up for lost income would all be tax-free. Even if you missed your chance back then, you could start now. If another market crash comes, Enghouse and several other decent dividend and growth stocks would be discounted.

Even a couple of thousands invested in a good growth stock can grow into a small emergency fund in about a decade.

Foolish takeaway

Even if you got CERB the wrong way, you can turn things around and send it back yourself before CRA comes calling. It might not be as easy, especially if you’ve spent it all, but if CRA decides to penalize fraudulent CERB recipients, you may have to pay back more than just the CERB. Taking matters into your own hands now would be a better long-term solution.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Adam Othman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Enghouse Systems Ltd.

More on Dividend Stocks

growing plant shoots on stacked coins
Dividend Stocks

5 Dividend Stocks to Buy With Yields Upwards of 5%

These five companies all earn tonnes of cash flow, making them some of the best long-term dividend stocks you can…

Read more »

funds, money, nest egg
Dividend Stocks

TFSA Investors: 3 Stocks to Start Building an Influx of Passive Income

A TFSA is the ideal registered account for passive income, as it doesn't weigh down your tax bill, and any…

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Dividend Stocks

3 of the Safest Dividend Stocks in Canada

Royal Bank of Canada stock is one of the safest TSX dividend stocks to buy. So is CT REIT and…

Read more »

Growing plant shoots on coins
Dividend Stocks

1 of the Top Canadian Growth Stocks to Buy in February 2023

Many top Canadian growth stocks represent strong underlying businesses, healthy financials, and organic growth opportunities.

Read more »

stock research, analyze data
Dividend Stocks

Wherever the Market Goes, I’m Buying These 3 TSX Stocks

Here are three TSX stocks that could outperform irrespective of the market direction.

Read more »

woman data analyze
Dividend Stocks

1 Oversold Dividend Stock (Yielding 6.5%) to Buy This Month

Here's why SmartCentres REIT (TSX:SRU.UN) is one top dividend stock that long-term investors should consider in this current market.

Read more »

IMAGE OF A NOTEBOOK WITH TFSA WRITTEN ON IT
Dividend Stocks

Better TFSA Buy: Enbridge Stock or Bank of Nova Scotia

Enbridge and Bank of Nova Scotia offer high yields for TFSA investors seeking passive income. Is one stock now undervalued?

Read more »

Golden crown on a red velvet background
Dividend Stocks

2 Top Stocks Just Became Canadian Dividend Aristocrats

These two top Canadian Dividend Aristocrats stocks are reliable companies with impressive long-term growth potential.

Read more »