CRA to Retirees: This New Update Is for You!

A new update from the CRA means retirees have less money coming in each month, but is that a bad thing these days?

| More on:
Senior Man Sitting On Sofa At Home With Pet Labrador Dog

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

There’s been some criticism coming out about the Canadian Emergency Response Benefit (CERB). Canada at first was heralded for getting its citizens cash in hand as soon as possible. However, it’s been months now that the pandemic has hit Canadians, and some changes became necessary. Some of those changes affect retirees.

For instance, many Canadians who didn’t necessarily need the benefit were contacted by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). Unfortunately, not only were payments suspended, but Canadians were told they would have to pay back the CERB. As Canada continues into a deficit not witnessed since the Second World War, it’s time the government started looking at other options.

What happened?

The Registered Retirement Income Fund (RRIF) are accounts registered with the federal government. The funds give retirees a steady source of income, taken from the savings accumulated in your Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP). Once you turn 65, Canadians must take out at least 4% of their RRIF balance at the beginning of each year, and claim it as income. That changes as you get older.

But for 2020, things have changed. The Canadian government saw that Canadians did not want to take out cash and claim it as income, as they need those savings to stay put. The minimum requirement was reduced by 25% for the year, unless you already withdrew more than the reduced amount for the year.

Unfortunately, you won’t be able to re-contribute that money back into your RRIF. So, what this means is retirees will only be taxed if they withdraw more than the minimum amount before reductions.

Do the math

Here’s how it would work if retirees had a minimum reduction of $12,000 before the reduction for a minimum of $1,000 per month. Reducing that $12,000 by 25% would give you $9,000. If you had already taken out $1,000 per month for January to April, that means you have $5,000 left for the year to reach the new minimum amount of $9,000. So, for the next eight months you have to take out $625 minimum.

It may sound like the government is simply putting a limit on you, but look at it this way. Right now, there is a market downturn. Retirees are going to want to keep their savings safe in a RRSP as long as they can. That’s because taking it out means you aren’t able to wait for a market rebound. The market always comes back, so when it does you’ll want as much of your savings in there as possible, not in cash.

Another option?

If retirees really want to get back to that $1,000 per month, there’s an easy way to do that: dividends. To make back that $3,000 for the year, you want a steady, stable, strong dividend yield to see you through 2020. One great option is BCE Inc. (TSX:BCE)(NYSE:BCE).

First off, the company hasn’t missed a payout in over 100 years. That includes during this pandemic, and all other economic downturns. The stock also has a high dividend yield of 5.82% as of writing. To make that $3,000 per year, that would mean an investment of about $51,000 as of writing.

Then retirees can hold onto this stock for years to come, as the company’s strength isn’t about to go anywhere any time soon. In fact, to reach pre-crash levels, there is still a potential upside of 14% as of writing.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Amy Legate-Wolfe has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

More on Coronavirus

little girl in pilot costume playing and dreaming of flying over the sky
Coronavirus

Air Canada Stock: How High Could it go?

AC stock is up 29% in the last six months alone, so should we expect more great things? Or is…

Read more »

eat food
Coronavirus

Goodfood Stock Doubles Within Days: Time to Buy?

Goodfood (TSX:FOOD) stock has surged 125% in the last few weeks, so what happened, and should investors hop back on…

Read more »

stock data
Tech Stocks

If I Could Only Buy 1 Stock Before 2023, This Would Be It

This stock is the one company that really doesn't deserve its ultra-low share price, so I'll definitely pick it up…

Read more »

Aircraft Mechanic checking jet engine of the airplane
Coronavirus

Air Canada Stock Fell 5% in November: Is it a Buy Today?

Air Canada (TSX:AC) stock saw remarkable improvements during its last quarter but still dropped 5% with more recession hints. So,…

Read more »

Airport and plane
Coronavirus

Is Air Canada Stock a Buy Today?

Airlines are on the rebound. Does Air Canada stock deserve to be on your buy list?

Read more »

A patient takes medicine out of a daily pill box.
Coronavirus

Retirees: 2 Healthcare Stocks That Could Help Set You up for Life

Healthcare stocks offer an incredible opportunity for growth for those investors who look to the right stocks, such as these…

Read more »

sad concerned deep in thought
Coronavirus

Here’s Why I Just Bought WELL Health Stock

WELL Health stock (TSX:WELL) may be a healthcare stock and a tech stock, but don't let that keep you from…

Read more »

healthcare pharma
Coronavirus

WELL Stock: The Safe Stock Investors Can’t Afford to Ignore

WELL stock (TSX:WELL) fell 68% from peak to trough, and yet there's no good reason as to why. So now…

Read more »