It Will Soon Be Harder to Buy a House in Canada

The housing industry is suffering alongside many other sectors in Canada. In order to reduce risk and protect home buyers, CMHC has revised its underwriting criteria.

House Key And Keychain On Wooden Table

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation recently announced changes in its underwriting policies that will make it harder for home buyers to qualify for a mortgage in the future. CMHC stated that the reasoning behind rolling out these changes is the expected home price reduction that the market is likely to see in the aftermath of COVID-19.

CMHC’s announcement about new underwriting rules has not been met with warmth in the industry. Two major private insurers declared that they wouldn’t be following CMHC’s lead and changing underwriting requirements for their borrowers.

New underwriting rules

The changes CMHC announced regarding new home applications (effective July 1) are significantly stricter than before. The GDS/TDS ratio has been changed from the previously lenient (39/44) to a relatively stricter (35/42).

The minimum credit requirement has also been pushed up from 600 to 680. Down payments from non-traditional sources (a loan, for example) that increase the debt burden of the home buyer are no longer acceptable.

CMHC claims that these changes are made to protect prospective home buyers and reduce risk. While these new requirements will certainly reduce the insurance risk for the company, they will also cut the potential home buyer pool substantially. Many home buyers that would have qualified for a mortgage before won’t be able to do so with these rules in place.

For a company that is aiming for 100% homeownership in the country by 2030, this move seems rather counterproductive. But that’s actually in line with CMHC’s debt management policies. Two private insurers, including Genworth MI Canada (TSX:MIC), have declared that they won’t be adopting these new underwriting rules, and will instead rely upon their existing model.

A private insurance company

The Genworth stock had a pretty decent run before the crash. It grew over 85% in the past five years (before the crash). Genworth is also a Dividend Aristocrat with a growth streak of 11 consecutive years. The company has a market cap of $3.2 billion, the total debt of $747 million, and a cash pile of $373 million.

The housing market was hit pretty hard in the pandemic, which is reflected in the stock price depreciation of Genworth. The company is currently trading $37 per share, about 36% down from its pre-crash value.

This makes it one of the most discounted stocks in the financial sector. The low valuation has also pushed the dividend yield to 5.83%, with a safe payout ratio of 43.66%.

According to the first-quarter results, the company grew its net operating income (by $5 million) and managed to maintain its premium earned, compared to the last quarter. The company also provided two generous special dividends to its investors this year.

Foolish takeaway

The strict underwriting policy is expected to have two effects — the first is that prospective homeowners that now don’t fit the requirements for mortgage approval may stay away from the market for a while (or seek mortgage institutions that will be willing to lend to them).

As well, many prospective buyers might start converging on the housing market before the new underwriting rules take effect.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Adam Othman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

More on Dividend Stocks

growing plant shoots on stacked coins
Dividend Stocks

5 Dividend Stocks to Buy With Yields Upwards of 5%

These five companies all earn tonnes of cash flow, making them some of the best long-term dividend stocks you can…

Read more »

funds, money, nest egg
Dividend Stocks

TFSA Investors: 3 Stocks to Start Building an Influx of Passive Income

A TFSA is the ideal registered account for passive income, as it doesn't weigh down your tax bill, and any…

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Dividend Stocks

3 of the Safest Dividend Stocks in Canada

Royal Bank of Canada stock is one of the safest TSX dividend stocks to buy. So is CT REIT and…

Read more »

Growing plant shoots on coins
Dividend Stocks

1 of the Top Canadian Growth Stocks to Buy in February 2023

Many top Canadian growth stocks represent strong underlying businesses, healthy financials, and organic growth opportunities.

Read more »

stock research, analyze data
Dividend Stocks

Wherever the Market Goes, I’m Buying These 3 TSX Stocks

Here are three TSX stocks that could outperform irrespective of the market direction.

Read more »

woman data analyze
Dividend Stocks

1 Oversold Dividend Stock (Yielding 6.5%) to Buy This Month

Here's why SmartCentres REIT (TSX:SRU.UN) is one top dividend stock that long-term investors should consider in this current market.

Read more »

IMAGE OF A NOTEBOOK WITH TFSA WRITTEN ON IT
Dividend Stocks

Better TFSA Buy: Enbridge Stock or Bank of Nova Scotia

Enbridge and Bank of Nova Scotia offer high yields for TFSA investors seeking passive income. Is one stock now undervalued?

Read more »

Golden crown on a red velvet background
Dividend Stocks

2 Top Stocks Just Became Canadian Dividend Aristocrats

These two top Canadian Dividend Aristocrats stocks are reliable companies with impressive long-term growth potential.

Read more »