Bombardier Inc (TSX:BBD.B) Is One Recession Away From Bankruptcy

Bombardier Inc (TSX:BBD.B) sale of its transportation unit might be lead to its undoing.

| More on:
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

As much as I like to see any iconic Canadian brand succeed, when it comes to Bombardier Inc (TSX:BBD.B), I’m inclined to believe that the company is one recession away from bankruptcy. There are two factors that support my thesis, the first being that the sale of Bombardier Transportation (BT) runs the risk of falling apart due to European anti-competitive law.

Furthermore, even if the sale were to be approved, the buyer of BT, Alstom, might either fail to come up with the necessary funding or present a low ball offer.

Post-sale, I question Bombardier’s sustainability as a pure-play business jet manufacturer, especially when faced with a global economic downturn.

Anything can happen in a year

Although Bombardier’s shares initially popped up on the news of the BT sale, the stock quickly gave up all gains and are now trading at levels not witnessed in four years.

The reasons behind the market malaise were two-fold. One, the time frame for the completion of the Alstom deal is at least a year away, and two, the proposal must still be approved by the notoriously tough EU antitrust office, which has shut down a similar mega-merger between Alstom and Siemens in the past.

Furthermore, even if the EU regulators were to approve the deal, there’s a chance that Alstom might fail to come up with the necessary funding should capital markets prove to be unfavourable in the coming months.

Moreover, there’s also an additional likelihood that Alstom might revise their terms lower, as history has shown that mergers & acquisitions EBITDA multiples tend to shrink during recessions, and the impetus for the deal to compete with China will be less pertinent should the Chinese economy face a hard landing.

Business jets exhibit extreme cyclicality

While I do applaud Bombardier’s management for pursuing major deals (and let’s face it, they really have no choice at this point), I do wish that Bombardier had sold the business jet unit instead and kept BT, as business jets are extremely cyclical.

For example, during the 2008 recession, the bottom fell out of the business jet market, with global deliveries plummeting 50%. Second, softness in the used jet market might return and rebound from their recent lows, as 9.7% of total jets available were for sale in 2019, up from 9% in 2018 (according to data from JETNET).

Moreover, even as a standalone jet manufacturer, Bombardier’s pro-forma debt will still be well north of $2 billion. From a deleveraging standpoint, the sale of the jet unit makes more sense, especially as Bombardier’s backlog is the highest it’s ever been, which means they would’ve gotten a premium multiple for this unit, quite possibly before a Corona-induced economic downturn.

The bottom line

The sale of BT was the most aggressive step ever taken by Bombardier to reduce its crippling debt burden. Unfortunately, the timing could not be worse, as we are now quite possibly facing a recession induced by both supply chain and demand shocks stemming from the Coronavirus.

Anything can happen in a year’s time, and should the deal with Alstom pass without a hiccup, Bombardier still has to contend with the economic cycle as a standalone business jet manufacturer.

For a more bullish take on Bombardier, visit my colleague’s article here.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor VMatsepudra has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

More on Top TSX Stocks

A sapling regrows in a forest that has been logged.
Top TSX Stocks

Small-Cap Investors: Our Favourite 12 Stocks for 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Motley Fool Hidden Gems' yearly list of "Starter Stocks" is our attempt to answer a simple question: “Where do I…

Read more »

top TSX stocks to buy
Stocks for Beginners

Just Released: The 5 Best Stocks to Buy in February 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Making money investing in stocks is not hard -- often, all you need is patience.

Read more »

runner ties shoe while stopped on grass outside
Stocks for Beginners

TFSA Investors: 10 Stocks Every Canadian Should Own in 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Motley Fool Stock Advisor's yearly list of "Starter Stocks" is our attempt to answer a simple question: “Where do I…

Read more »

Value for money
Top TSX Stocks

10 Top TSX Value Stocks to Buy in January 2023

Every month, we ask our freelance writer investors to share their best stock ideas with you. Here’s what they said…

Read more »

top tsx growth stocks to buy
Top TSX Stocks

9 Top TSX Stocks to Buy in January 2023

Every month, we ask our freelance writer investors to share their best stock ideas with you. Here’s what they said…

Read more »

two people use AI to examine a house
Stocks for Beginners

Just Released: The 5 Best Stocks to Buy in January 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Let’s cut to the chase: It’s absolutely true that shares of Redfin, an online real estate platform, have fallen 93%…

Read more »

Striking match creates fire and light.
Stocks for Beginners

Just Released: 10 Stocks Every Canadian Should Own in 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Our yearly list of "Starter Stocks" is our attempt to answer a simple question: “Where do I go first?”

Read more »

eat food
Top TSX Stocks

Loblaw Stock – Can it Keep Outperforming in 2023?

Loblaw stock had another great year, but the valuation is getting a tad stretched versus recent historical averages.

Read more »