TFSA Investors: You can Beat Hedge Funds With This Dirty Little Secret

Passive income and substantial returns could be easier with an index fund like the iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (TSX:XIU).

| More on:
Coworkers standing near a wall

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

Hedge funds, university endowment funds, and institutional investors — the so-called smart money — deal in hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars. All those resources should afford these mega funds exceptional access and better results, right? Here’s the dirty secret: they don’t.

Investment performance is relatively easy to measure. You select a benchmark, such as an index that tracks the performance of the largest companies in your country, and see if your portfolio outperformed the index on an annual basis. 

In other words, if you were able to pick winners and shun losers from a basket, that should be reflected in a higher return than the whole basket. Sustained outperformance is the hallmark of great investing. Warren Buffett’s portfolio, for example, has compounded at an annual rate of 18.7% since 1965 compared to 9.7% for the S&P 500. 

Meanwhile, how did the average hedge fund perform? According to the Credit Suisse Hedge Fund Index, between January 1994 and October 2018, the hedge fund industry underperformed the benchmark S&P 500 index by a whopping 2.25% annualized. 

In other words, simply investing in a low-cost, passive fund that tracks the broader stock market would have given average investors with no special skills better returns than multi-millionaire hedge fund managers and their billionaire investors.

How to apply this

Passive investing in low-cost index funds has been gaining momentum in recent years. More investors are taking a closer look at the data and academic literature that suggests beating the market is so difficult, it’s nearly impossible. Investing in index funds is cheap, easy, and (most importantly) lucrative. 

iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (TSX:XIU) is, perhaps, the best option for retail investors in Canada. Not only is it the largest exchange-traded fund (ETF) in Canada at the moment, but when it was created in 1990, it was the first ETF in the world. 

Since then, the ETF has delivered a compounded annual growth rate of 7.02%. Compare that to the 5.87% interest rate the Bank of Canada has averaged over the same period, and you can see why the higher risk of stocks is worth it in the long run. 

XIU currently holds a basket of Canada’s 60-largest listed companies. The largest holding is Royal Bank of Canada. Meanwhile, the financial sector is the largest portion of the overall portfolio, contributing 35.36% of the total fund. 

However, even this impressive ETF can’t live up to the S&P 500. Canadian investors can invest in America’s benchmark index through the iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF, which is hedged to the Canadian dollar. This ETF has outperformed the XIU by a couple of percentage points over the past one-year, three-year, and 10-year periods. 

However, the dividend yield offered by the core S&P 500 ETF is nearly half the rate offered by the TSX 60 index, so domestic stocks might be better for income seekers. Growth-oriented investors might want to take a closer look at America’s flagship index.  

Bottom line

Passive investments in index funds have surged in recent years, as more investors realize that professional management and high fees don’t guarantee outperformance over the long run. 

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Vishesh Raisinghani has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. 

More on Top TSX Stocks

A sapling regrows in a forest that has been logged.
Top TSX Stocks

Small-Cap Investors: Our Favourite 12 Stocks for 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Motley Fool Hidden Gems' yearly list of "Starter Stocks" is our attempt to answer a simple question: “Where do I…

Read more »

top TSX stocks to buy
Stocks for Beginners

Just Released: The 5 Best Stocks to Buy in February 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Making money investing in stocks is not hard -- often, all you need is patience.

Read more »

runner ties shoe while stopped on grass outside
Stocks for Beginners

TFSA Investors: 10 Stocks Every Canadian Should Own in 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Motley Fool Stock Advisor's yearly list of "Starter Stocks" is our attempt to answer a simple question: “Where do I…

Read more »

Value for money
Top TSX Stocks

10 Top TSX Value Stocks to Buy in January 2023

Every month, we ask our freelance writer investors to share their best stock ideas with you. Here’s what they said…

Read more »

top tsx growth stocks to buy
Top TSX Stocks

9 Top TSX Stocks to Buy in January 2023

Every month, we ask our freelance writer investors to share their best stock ideas with you. Here’s what they said…

Read more »

two people use AI to examine a house
Stocks for Beginners

Just Released: The 5 Best Stocks to Buy in January 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Let’s cut to the chase: It’s absolutely true that shares of Redfin, an online real estate platform, have fallen 93%…

Read more »

Striking match creates fire and light.
Stocks for Beginners

Just Released: 10 Stocks Every Canadian Should Own in 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Our yearly list of "Starter Stocks" is our attempt to answer a simple question: “Where do I go first?”

Read more »

eat food
Top TSX Stocks

Loblaw Stock – Can it Keep Outperforming in 2023?

Loblaw stock had another great year, but the valuation is getting a tad stretched versus recent historical averages.

Read more »