Is it Time to Revisit These 2 Former Greats?

When the market stutters, an opportunity to invest in long-forgotten investments emerges. Here’s what that means for Cameco Corp. (TSX:CCO)(NYSE:CCJ) and this other company.

| More on:
edit Person using calculator next to charts and graphs

Image source: Getty Images.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

When the markets retreat as they have in recent weeks, an opportunity to revisit certain underperforming stocks emerges. This is particularly true for those stocks that recently completed a turnaround and haven’t fully proven themselves in the eyes of investors.

Two such investment options are Bausch Health Companies (TSX:BHC)(NYSE:BHC) and Cameco (TSX:CCO)(NYSE:CCJ). Let’s take a look at both of these companies and determine if the recent market pullback translates into a buying opportunity.

You might be surprised how healthy this company is

There are few companies still on the market today that have endured a turnaround on the scale that Bausch has. Following a failed business model that was built on cheap loans and successive acquisitions, Bausch has finally amassed a nicely sized portfolio of products with significant earnings potential (which the company has rightfully referred to as the Significant Seven). Adding to that appeal is the fact that Bausch has clawed away at its massive debt and is nearing a return to profitability.

Why would you want to consider Bausch for your portfolio? Apart from the growing number of profitable products in its portfolio, Bausch is finally a viable option to consider. That may leave a bitter taste to one-time investors under the company’s former incarnation, but this really is a different company.

In the most recent quarter, Bausch registered 3% organic growth — the company’s sixth successive quarter of growth. The company also managed to generate US$339 million in cash from operations while paying down US$100 million in debt in the most recent quarter.

If you have an appetite for risk and are a long-term investor, a small position in Bausch may be justified.

Will this stock finally go nuclear?

Unlike Bausch, Cameco isn’t suffering from a broken business model but rather a lack of growth. As one of the largest uranium miners on the planet, Cameco provides fuel to nuclear reactors around the globe under long-term contracts, not unlike the PPA contracts that utilities use. While this shields Cameco from immediate fluctuations in the market price of uranium, it’s still dependent on there being demand for uranium on the market.

Following the Fukushima disaster in 2011, demand for nuclear power, and, by extension, the uranium the Cameco mines, dropped significantly. This resulted in the market price for a pound of uranium dropping from near US$60 to the low US$20s. This left the company mining a product that was decreasing in value and nobody was buying. Adding to those woes was the fact that Cameco didn’t reduce production to match that much lower demand, which resulted in a glut of uranium hitting the market. A longstanding dispute with the CRA also weighed in on Cameco, with a potential $2 billion tax bill driving the stock even lower.

So, what has changed, and why now?

There are three factors that point to a better future for Cameco. First, we have Cameco’s steep production cuts. Cameco shuttered many of its higher-quality facilities, which slashed costs significantly. The company also began fulfilling orders from its existing supply reserves, buying excess uranium off the market itself, which has helped to kickstart demand, as did an influx of new reactors under construction around the world. Finally, a favourable decision in the CRA dispute removed a massive cloud over the company’s delicate finances.

Whether or not this makes the company a viable investment remains to be seen. Cameco is not without risk, and while nuclear power is steadily making a renaissance in some markets, it could be a few more quarters before the production cuts provide the jolt the market needs.

Investors with an appetite for risk may want to consider a small position in the stock, while others with shorter timelines or who want an income stream may be better off looking elsewhere.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Demetris Afxentiou has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Bausch Health Companies.

More on Investing

Investing

KM Throwaway Post

Read more »

Investing

Carlos Test Yoast Metadata

Read more »

Investing

KM Ad Test

This is my excerpt.

Read more »

Investing

Test post for affiliate partner mockups

Updated: 9/17/2024. This post was not sponsored. The views and opinions expressed in this review are purely those of the…

Read more »

Investing

Testing Ecap Error

Premium content from Motley Fool Stock Advisor We here at Motley Fool Stock Advisor believe investors should own at least…

Read more »

Investing

TSX Today: Testing the Ad for James

la la la dee dah.

Read more »

Lady holding remote control pointed towards a TV
Investing

2 Streaming Stocks to Buy Now and 1 to Run From

There are streaming stocks on the TSX that are worth paying attention to in 2023 and beyond.

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Stocks for Beginners

Top Recession-Resilient TSX Stocks to Buy With $3,000

It's time to increase your exposure to defensives!

Read more »