Cenovus Energy Inc (TSX:CVE) Posts $2.7 Billion Loss for 2018: Should Investors Be Worried?

Cenovus Energy Inc (TSX:CVE)(NYSE:CVE) had a disappointing finish to the year, but there’s still hope things could turn around.

| More on:
Economic Turbulence

Image source: Getty Images

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

Cenovus Energy (TSX:CVE)(NYSE:CVE) released its year-end results on Wednesday. Overall, it was a bit of a mixed bag for Cenovus, and although sales for the year were up 22%, the company still posted a deep net loss of $2.7 million, which is noticeably worse than the $3.4 million profit that it recorded a year ago.

Let’s take a closer look at the results to see what drove big loss and whether Cenovus is still in good shape going forward.

Exploration expenses and cost of goods drive up costs

A big cost weighing down the quarter and year was exploration expense. Cenovus wrote off $2.1 billion of previously capitalized exploration and evaluation costs that were related to the Deep Basin. Last year, the exploration expense was a little under $900 million.

However, a lot of rising costs were also to do with the company’s cost of goods sold. Purchased product and transportation and blending costs were up over $2.9 billion this year, or nearly 25% from the prior year. That’s higher than the rate of sales growth that Cenovus achieved during the year.

In addition, Cenovus incurred a charge of $854 million relating to foreign exchange as well as a $795 million loss as a result of the sale of a subsidiary, Cenovus Pipestone Partnership.

Overall, Cenovus recorded an operating loss from continuing operations of more than $3.9 billion compared to earnings of $2.2 billion in the prior year. There were no shortage of items weighing on the company during the past year, and, unfortunately, they’ve added a lot of noise to the financials. While we can point to several and say that Cenovus would have broken if not for all these items, the fact of the matter is, they can’t be ignored and are a result of real risks that the company faces.

Previous year boosted by gains, discontinued operations

Another big reason that the financials look a lot worse than they did a year ago is that in 2017 Cenovus benefited from a revaluation gain of $2.5 billion as well as a $1.1 billion gain from discontinued operations. Without those items giving its financials a boost in 2017, Cenovus would have posted a loss for the year.

Better times ahead?

Despite the challenging year and quarter, CEO Alex Pourbaix was optimistic about the results given how the obstacles that Cenovus had faced: “In the fourth quarter, in some of the most difficult macro-economic conditions we’ve ever faced and while voluntarily managing our oil sands production lower, we remained relatively cash flow neutral and continued to deleverage our balance sheet. I believe we are well positioned to make material progress on our business plan and further deleverage in 2019.”

Cenovus is certainly in a better position today when it comes to cost control than it was a year or two ago. And so what it really needs is some help on the top line. If the Alberta Government’s moves to help boost the price of Western Canada Select ends up paying off, then Cenovus and others in the industry could see some much stronger financials in future quarters.

Despite the disappointing overall performance, investors weren’t bearish on the results, as the stock was up around 2% in early trading on Wednesday.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

More on Energy Stocks

Group of industrial workers in a refinery - oil processing equipment and machinery
Energy Stocks

Up by 25%: Is Cenovus Stock a Good Buy in February 2023?

After a powerful bullish run, the energy sector in Canada has finally stabilized, and it might be ripe for a…

Read more »

A worker overlooks an oil refinery plant.
Energy Stocks

Cenovus Stock: Here’s What’s Coming Next

Cenovus stock has rallied strong along with commodity prices. Expect more as the company continues to digest its Husky acquisition.

Read more »

A stock price graph showing growth over time
Energy Stocks

What Share Buybacks Mean for Energy Investors in 2023 and 1 TSX Stock That Could Outperform

Will TSX energy stocks continue to delight investors in 2023?

Read more »

Arrowings ascending on a chalkboard
Energy Stocks

2 Top TSX Energy Stocks That Could Beat Vermilion Energy

TSX energy stocks will likely outperform in 2023. But not all are equally well placed.

Read more »

Gas pipelines
Energy Stocks

Suncor Stock: How High Could it Go in 2023?

Suncor stock is starting off 2023 as an undervalued underdog, but after a record year, the company is standing strong…

Read more »

oil and natural gas
Energy Stocks

Should You Buy Emera Stock in February 2023?

Emera stock has returned 9% compounded annually in the last 10 years, including dividends.

Read more »

grow money, wealth build
Energy Stocks

TFSA: Investing $8,000 in Enbridge Stock Today Could Bring $500 in Tax-Free Dividends

TSX dividend stocks such as Enbridge can be held in a TFSA to allow shareholders generate tax-free dividend income each…

Read more »

oil and natural gas
Energy Stocks

3 TSX Energy Stocks to Buy if the Slump Continues

Three energy stocks trading at depressed prices due to the oil slump are buying opportunities before demand returns.

Read more »