1 Stock Near 52-Week Lows: Should You Buy Before February?

Gluskin Sheff & Associates Inc. (TSX:GS) stock has suffered in January. The promise of future volatility does not inspire confidence as we head into February.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

In early 2018, I’d warned investors to be wary of financial stocks. The previous year had produced solid gains for the Canadian market, and U.S. indexes soared on the back of U.S. tax reform. However, earnings growth was largely priced in throughout the year. Stronger economic indicators also paved the way for higher interest rates, which motivated anxiety in the investing world. This would set the stage for a choppy 2018 as far as valuations were concerned in the financial sector.

Financial stocks were hammered in the final months of 2018, but several top bank stocks have bounced back nicely in January. Today, we are going to look at one financial stock that has plummeted to 52-week lows this month. Is it worth picking up before February? Let’s dive in.

Gluskin Sheff & Associates (TSX:GS) stock has plunged 11.1% in 2019 as of mid-afternoon trading on January 28. Shares have dropped 41% year over year. Gluskin Sheff & Associates manages investment portfolios for high-net-worth clients and select institutional investors.

The company is set to release its second-quarter fiscal 2019 results on February 6. In the first quarter, Gluskin Sheff reported that total assets under management dropped to $8.89 billion as at September 30, 2018, compared to $8.92 billion as at September 30, 2017. Slower summer sales and larger net withdrawals were in part offset by a positive net investment performance of $35 million. President and CEO Jeff Moody reiterated the company’s expectations of volatility going forward and stressed its focus on discipline and risk management.

On January 18, Gluskin Sheff announced assets under management of $8.2 billion as at December 31, 2018. The decline in AUM was attributable to a negative net investment performance of $592 million and net withdrawals of $108 million. Moody described the quarter as “the most challenging market we have been confronted with since the Global Financial Crisis.”

David Rosenberg, chief economist and strategist at Gluskin Sheff, has long been skeptical about the post-tax reform bounce. He called the recent TSX rebound “a rally for traders to rent, and not for investors to own.” Rosenberg has struck a bearish tone for some time now and late last year called for a recession within 12 months. With its chief economist remaining firmly in the bear camp, should investors feel the same way about Gluskin stock?

Shares of Gluskin had an RSI of 38 as of this writing. This indicates that the stock is just outside oversold territory in late January. However, at a price of $9.40, the stock is trading very close to its 52-week low of $9.07.

Gluskin looks like a very risky pick-up, as we await its next earnings release. However, shares may pique the interest of income investors. The stock last paid out a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share, which represents a monster 10.8% yield. Of course, continued poor performance for the company and for the markets at large could put this high payout at risk going forward. The stock has been battered over the last year and looks poised for more trouble, so its attractive dividend does not move the needle to a buy.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Ambrose O'Callaghan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

Investing

KM Throwaway Post

Read more »

Investing

Carlos Test Yoast Metadata

Read more »

Investing

KM Ad Test

This is my excerpt.

Read more »

Investing

Test post for affiliate partner mockups

Updated: 9/17/2024. This post was not sponsored. The views and opinions expressed in this review are purely those of the…

Read more »

Investing

Testing Ecap Error

Premium content from Motley Fool Stock Advisor We here at Motley Fool Stock Advisor believe investors should own at least…

Read more »

Investing

TSX Today: Testing the Ad for James

la la la dee dah.

Read more »

Lady holding remote control pointed towards a TV
Investing

2 Streaming Stocks to Buy Now and 1 to Run From

There are streaming stocks on the TSX that are worth paying attention to in 2023 and beyond.

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Stocks for Beginners

Top Recession-Resilient TSX Stocks to Buy With $3,000

It's time to increase your exposure to defensives!

Read more »