Better Buy: Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (TSX:CNQ) vs. Baytex Energy Corp. (TSX:BTE)

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (TSX:CNQ) (NYSE:CNQ) offers investors energy exposure in the form of a cash-rich dividend stock, while Baytex Energy Corp. (TSX:BTE) (NYSE:BTE) offers the more risky bet with greater upside.

| More on:
Oil pipes in an oil field

Image source: Getty Images.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

Oil and gas stocks are getting hit hard as oil prices have fallen off a cliff recently amid mounting concerns about demand and supply.

For those investors who are looking to use this weakness to add to their oil and gas investments, which Canada’s well-known energy producers should you add, Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. (TSX:CNQ)(NYSE:CNQ) or Baytex Energy Corp. (TSX:BTE)?

The answer depends on risk tolerance, your opinion (and your level of conviction) on oil prices, and your return goals.

First off, let’s take a look at the similarities of these two stocks.

The biggest thing they have in common is that they are both “oily” energy producers, and both derive a significant portion of their production from the lower-value heavy oil, as 40% of Baytex’s total production and 40% of Canadian Natural Resources’ production is heavy oil.

So they have both been affected by the widening of Western Canadian Select oil price differentials and the struggles of the Canadian energy sector.

But this is where the similarities end.

Canadian Natural has been on a long, consistent road of shareholder value creation, with dividend increases and stock price outperformance being the norm.

Canadian Natural is a cash machine that continues to generate strong cash flows and income for investors, yet CNQ stock is down approximately 25% versus four years ago.

In the first nine months of 2018, Canadian Natural has seen a 50% increase in funds from operations, free cash flow after dividends of approximately $3.1 billion, and a sharp improvement in oil sands mining operating costs to $22.90 per barrel.

With a 4% dividend yield, a predictable and reliable stream of cash flows with little reserve replacement risk, CNQ stock remains a secure pick for energy exposure.

Baytex stock, on the other hand, has been a disaster, trading at a mere fraction of its stock price of over $40 just four years ago, as Baytex struggled with high debt levels, rising costs, and declining production.

But with the help of shareholder dilution, unfortunately for existing shareholders, Baytex has accomplished something positive with its acquisition of Raging River Exploration.

This merger has effectively solved the two biggest problems that have plagued the company in the past: its debt load and its lack of diversification, making it a solid choice to consider to upside to a recovering oil and gas sector.

It strengthens Baytex’s balance sheet, bringing its net debt to equity ratio to below two times from three times; it diversifies its production base, giving the company quality light oil assets and land in the Duvernay area in Alberta.

Final thoughts

In closing, the choice between these two oil and gas stocks comes down mostly to risk tolerance.

Investors who are looking for a steadier, top notch oil and a gas company that will give them a steady income stream and worry-free exposure should go with Canadian Natural stock, while investors seeking greater potential upside at the expense of more volatility and potential downside should go with Baytex stock.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Karen Thomas owns shares of Canadian Natural Resources and CDN NATURAL RES.

More on Dividend Stocks

growing plant shoots on stacked coins
Dividend Stocks

5 Dividend Stocks to Buy With Yields Upwards of 5%

These five companies all earn tonnes of cash flow, making them some of the best long-term dividend stocks you can…

Read more »

funds, money, nest egg
Dividend Stocks

TFSA Investors: 3 Stocks to Start Building an Influx of Passive Income

A TFSA is the ideal registered account for passive income, as it doesn't weigh down your tax bill, and any…

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Dividend Stocks

3 of the Safest Dividend Stocks in Canada

Royal Bank of Canada stock is one of the safest TSX dividend stocks to buy. So is CT REIT and…

Read more »

Growing plant shoots on coins
Dividend Stocks

1 of the Top Canadian Growth Stocks to Buy in February 2023

Many top Canadian growth stocks represent strong underlying businesses, healthy financials, and organic growth opportunities.

Read more »

stock research, analyze data
Dividend Stocks

Wherever the Market Goes, I’m Buying These 3 TSX Stocks

Here are three TSX stocks that could outperform irrespective of the market direction.

Read more »

woman data analyze
Dividend Stocks

1 Oversold Dividend Stock (Yielding 6.5%) to Buy This Month

Here's why SmartCentres REIT (TSX:SRU.UN) is one top dividend stock that long-term investors should consider in this current market.

Read more »

IMAGE OF A NOTEBOOK WITH TFSA WRITTEN ON IT
Dividend Stocks

Better TFSA Buy: Enbridge Stock or Bank of Nova Scotia

Enbridge and Bank of Nova Scotia offer high yields for TFSA investors seeking passive income. Is one stock now undervalued?

Read more »

Golden crown on a red velvet background
Dividend Stocks

2 Top Stocks Just Became Canadian Dividend Aristocrats

These two top Canadian Dividend Aristocrats stocks are reliable companies with impressive long-term growth potential.

Read more »