Should You Buy Lululemon Athletica (TSX:LLL) After Stellar Q3 Earnings?

Lululemon Athletica (TSX:LLL)(NYSE:LULU) fell immediately after posting red-hot growth in Q3. Time to buy the dip?

| More on:
edit Person using calculator next to charts and graphs

Image source: Getty Images.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

Lululemon Athletica Ltd (TSX:LULU)(NYSE:LULU) has been on fire in 2018. Starting off the year at $79, it has since reached as high as $140–a 77% gain.

This month, the bullish trend seems to be bending, as the stock has fallen about 5% since Monday. But despite the falling stock price, the news coming out of the company is better than ever. On Thursday, Lululemon released a stellar earnings report that beat Wall Street’s expectations on every measure. Whether you’re looking at revenue, net income, same store sales, or any other metric, the company was well ahead of what everybody had anticipated.

When you’ve got a steep downturn in a stock that’s posting blowout earnings, the natural tendency is to buy the dip. But perhaps the markets know something that the Q3 earnings report doesn’t betray. Before examining that possibility, let’s review the good news from Lululemon in more detail.

Red-hot growth

If anything was clear in Lululemon’s Q3 earnings announcement, it’s that the company is growing like a wildfire. Net income was up 60%; operating income was up 59%; and revenue was up 21%. Gross profit was up 26%. Basically, in the third quarter, Lululemon grew according to every relevant metric. And by many of those metrics, the growth was huge.

The one sour note in all this is the matter of taxes: because the company made more than ever before, it paid more to the tax man as well: net tax burden grew from $27.7 million to $43.5 million. However, the company’s tax RATE actually declined from 32% to 31.6%, so this is arguably even more good news in disguise.

Same-store sales

It’s one thing for a company to grow its revenue, net income and gross profit. But for retailers, there’s another metric that’s arguably even more important: same store sales. Same store sales is a measure of revenue from stores that have been open a year or more. It’s a valuable metric, as it indicates the demand for a company’s products, as opposed to revenue that comes from opening more stores, which may reflect people buying out of convenience.

For Q4, analysts were expecting Lululemon to grow same-store sales by 13.8 per cent. And by this metric, too, the company exceeded expectations, by growing at 18% year-over-year. This indicates that customers are spending more money at Lululemon stores (or alternatively that more people are shopping at them), which is great because it shows that the company can grow without the risk and expenses of opening brand new stores.

Outlook cut

So Q3 was a massive success for Lululemon by almost every metric. Which begs the question: why did the price fall on the same day these numbers were released?

One possibility is the fact that the company changed its outlook for Q4. In Thursday’s report, management said that they expected Q4’s diluted EPS to be in the $1.64 to $1.67 range. This was weaker than Wall Street expected; however, it still represents phenomenal growth.

In Q3, Lululemon earned just $.071 per share, and in Q4 last year, it earned about $0.88 per share. I think nearly doubling EPS year-over-year counts as a win, even if Wall Street expected more. Expect Lululemon’s strong returns to continue into 2019.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Andrew Button has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

More on Top TSX Stocks

A sapling regrows in a forest that has been logged.
Top TSX Stocks

Small-Cap Investors: Our Favourite 12 Stocks for 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Motley Fool Hidden Gems' yearly list of "Starter Stocks" is our attempt to answer a simple question: “Where do I…

Read more »

top TSX stocks to buy
Stocks for Beginners

Just Released: The 5 Best Stocks to Buy in February 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Making money investing in stocks is not hard -- often, all you need is patience.

Read more »

runner ties shoe while stopped on grass outside
Stocks for Beginners

TFSA Investors: 10 Stocks Every Canadian Should Own in 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Motley Fool Stock Advisor's yearly list of "Starter Stocks" is our attempt to answer a simple question: “Where do I…

Read more »

Value for money
Top TSX Stocks

10 Top TSX Value Stocks to Buy in January 2023

Every month, we ask our freelance writer investors to share their best stock ideas with you. Here’s what they said…

Read more »

top tsx growth stocks to buy
Top TSX Stocks

9 Top TSX Stocks to Buy in January 2023

Every month, we ask our freelance writer investors to share their best stock ideas with you. Here’s what they said…

Read more »

two people use AI to examine a house
Stocks for Beginners

Just Released: The 5 Best Stocks to Buy in January 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Let’s cut to the chase: It’s absolutely true that shares of Redfin, an online real estate platform, have fallen 93%…

Read more »

Striking match creates fire and light.
Stocks for Beginners

Just Released: 10 Stocks Every Canadian Should Own in 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Our yearly list of "Starter Stocks" is our attempt to answer a simple question: “Where do I go first?”

Read more »

eat food
Top TSX Stocks

Loblaw Stock – Can it Keep Outperforming in 2023?

Loblaw stock had another great year, but the valuation is getting a tad stretched versus recent historical averages.

Read more »