BCE Inc.’s Q3 Subscriber Growth Negated by Rising Costs

A decrease in tax expenses helped BCE Inc. (TSX:BCE)(NYSE:BCE) record an increase in net income for Q3.

The Motley Fool
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

BCE Inc. (TSX:BCE)(NYSE:BCE) released its third-quarter results today. Revenues reached $5.6 billion — up 5% from last year. Earnings also showed a modest 2% improvement, although earnings per share of $0.86 were down from $0.87 a year ago.

I’ll take a closer look at the quarterly results to see what drove these improvements and if BCE is a good buy today.

The company saw subscribers increase in all of its segments

BCE added 106,982 net wireless subscribers in Q3, which is up from 100,256 a year ago. Postpaid wireless subscribers were up 117,182, while the prepaid side saw a net loss of over 10,200 customers.

High-speed internet subscriptions were up 44,424, and 12.8% more than the 39,375 net additions last year.

Has cord cutting stalled?

BCE added net 1,738 television subscriptions, which is a big improvement over the 4,723 net loss it showed a year ago. Shaw Communications Inc. (TSX:SJR.B)(NYSE:SJR) in its Q4 results also saw a turning of the tide with cable subscribers increasing, rather than the declines the company had seen in the previous year.

However, Rogers Communications Inc. (TSX:RCI.B)(NYSE:RCI) still continued to see the bleeding in its latest quarter.

Whether cord cutting has slowed down or the remaining subscribers were never really threats to leave doesn’t ultimately make a difference. With minimal gains from television subscribers seen by BCE and Shaw, the real question will be if cord cutters come back, or if the lost subscribers are gone for good.

Adjusted EBITDA growth of 5.8%

Although BCE saw strong subscriber growth this quarter, operating revenue increases of 5% from last year were partially offset by a 4.4% increase in operating costs. A couple of big reasons for the risings costs include higher programming costs as well as increased promotional activities and focus on customer retention.

However, BCE still saw an improvement of $130 million in adjusted EBITDA.

Increased EBITDA used to offset rising costs

Unfortunately, the increase in EBITDA had to go to offset other rising costs on BCE’s financials.

The company saw over $106 million added to its depreciation and amortization expenses this quarter compared to last, as the previous year did not include the results of the MTS acquisition. In addition to having more assets to amortize and depreciate as a result of the acquisition, BCE has also made investments to its services, which would have resulted in higher costs for these line items as well.

BCE also saw other expenses rise by $43 million, which was mainly the result of losses from equity investments and early debt redemption costs.

Income taxes were down $47 million for the quarter and were one of the few spots on the income statement that didn’t see costs rise. Without the tax savings, BCE would have seen a drop in earnings for the quarter as other operating costs increased $160 million and more than offset the $130 million increase that BCE saw in its adjusted EBITDA.

Is BCE a buy today?

The company had good growth and has shown that it can continue to increase its subscriber base, despite adverse industry conditions. The stock provides a good and stable investment for those looking for consistency and a strong dividend, but don’t expect much in the way of capital appreciation.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor David Jagielski has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Dividend Stocks

growing plant shoots on stacked coins
Dividend Stocks

5 Dividend Stocks to Buy With Yields Upwards of 5%

These five companies all earn tonnes of cash flow, making them some of the best long-term dividend stocks you can…

Read more »

funds, money, nest egg
Dividend Stocks

TFSA Investors: 3 Stocks to Start Building an Influx of Passive Income

A TFSA is the ideal registered account for passive income, as it doesn't weigh down your tax bill, and any…

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Dividend Stocks

3 of the Safest Dividend Stocks in Canada

Royal Bank of Canada stock is one of the safest TSX dividend stocks to buy. So is CT REIT and…

Read more »

Growing plant shoots on coins
Dividend Stocks

1 of the Top Canadian Growth Stocks to Buy in February 2023

Many top Canadian growth stocks represent strong underlying businesses, healthy financials, and organic growth opportunities.

Read more »

stock research, analyze data
Dividend Stocks

Wherever the Market Goes, I’m Buying These 3 TSX Stocks

Here are three TSX stocks that could outperform irrespective of the market direction.

Read more »

woman data analyze
Dividend Stocks

1 Oversold Dividend Stock (Yielding 6.5%) to Buy This Month

Here's why SmartCentres REIT (TSX:SRU.UN) is one top dividend stock that long-term investors should consider in this current market.

Read more »

IMAGE OF A NOTEBOOK WITH TFSA WRITTEN ON IT
Dividend Stocks

Better TFSA Buy: Enbridge Stock or Bank of Nova Scotia

Enbridge and Bank of Nova Scotia offer high yields for TFSA investors seeking passive income. Is one stock now undervalued?

Read more »

Golden crown on a red velvet background
Dividend Stocks

2 Top Stocks Just Became Canadian Dividend Aristocrats

These two top Canadian Dividend Aristocrats stocks are reliable companies with impressive long-term growth potential.

Read more »