Which Recent IPO Is the Better Buy: Canada Goose Holdings Inc or Jamieson Wellness Inc?

Jamieson Wellness Inc (TSX:JWEL) has outperformed Canada Goose Holdings Inc (TSX:GOOS)(NYSE:GOOS) so far this year, but is it the better buy?

| More on:
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

An IPO can be an exciting investment to get in on because of the attraction to get in early on the next big thing before everyone else does. However, being a public company means more exposure and more scrutiny from investors, while requiring more controls, processes, and audits to be put in place. It’s no easy transition, and there are many costs and challenges that come along with the change.

I’ll have a look at two IPOs that have launched this year on the TSX to compare how the stocks have done since the launch, and which one I believe is the better investment today.

Down coats and stock prices

Canada Goose Holdings Inc (TSX:GOOS)(NYSE:GOOS) began trading on the TSX back in March, and its stock is only up 1% since then, at a price of over $21 per share. In early June, the stock reached a high of $32.80 as a result of a stronger than expected fourth quarter. However, since reaching its peak the share price has tumbled down more than 30% to its current level.

Given where interest rates are heading and with mortgage costs set to increase for homeowners, it is difficult to see how much growth a company can have selling $1,000 parkas or $600 sweaters. Although demand has been growing and sales have more than doubled in three years, I am skeptical about how much growth can be left to achieve for a premium brand at a time when spending is going to be getting tighter for many consumers.

There is a lot of seasonality in the brand’s sales, and three of the last five quarters have landed the company in the red. The company’s earnings per share in the last twelve months is just $0.22. At Canada Goose’s current price of just under $22, it is trading at about 100 times its earnings, making it an expensive valuation by any stretch. Typically you pay a premium for strong growth prospects, and in Canada Goose’s case I just don’t see where the growth is going to come from. By comparison, Gildan Activewear Inc trades at a multiple of less than 19 times its earnings.

Investor medicine

Jamieson Wellness Inc (TSX:JWEL) is a well-known vitamin maker and a strong brand in the health and wellness industry. It launched on the TSX less than two months ago and, in that short window of time, has seen its stock appreciate by over 8%.

The company has also struggled to turn profits, with the past two quarters being in the red, along with the most recent fiscal year showing a net loss of over $25 million. However, Jamieson has more opportunity for growth given vitamins are much more of a necessity than high-end winter clothing like Canada Goose. In addition, Jamieson is working on expanding into other parts of the world which will help drive its revenue further.

Bottom line

Both of these new stocks have had trouble turning profits, so you are effectively investing in potential and future upside as opposed to past and present performance. Jamieson is my choice for growth reasons and because of its focus on health and wellness the company has a much broader appeal than Canada Goose’s premium apparel line. Jamieson also has a strong position in its industry which gives it a big advantage compared to Canada Goose that has relatively limited reach and market share.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor David Jagielski has no position in any stocks mentioned. 

More on Top TSX Stocks

A sapling regrows in a forest that has been logged.
Top TSX Stocks

Small-Cap Investors: Our Favourite 12 Stocks for 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Motley Fool Hidden Gems' yearly list of "Starter Stocks" is our attempt to answer a simple question: “Where do I…

Read more »

top TSX stocks to buy
Stocks for Beginners

Just Released: The 5 Best Stocks to Buy in February 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Making money investing in stocks is not hard -- often, all you need is patience.

Read more »

runner ties shoe while stopped on grass outside
Stocks for Beginners

TFSA Investors: 10 Stocks Every Canadian Should Own in 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Motley Fool Stock Advisor's yearly list of "Starter Stocks" is our attempt to answer a simple question: “Where do I…

Read more »

Value for money
Top TSX Stocks

10 Top TSX Value Stocks to Buy in January 2023

Every month, we ask our freelance writer investors to share their best stock ideas with you. Here’s what they said…

Read more »

top tsx growth stocks to buy
Top TSX Stocks

9 Top TSX Stocks to Buy in January 2023

Every month, we ask our freelance writer investors to share their best stock ideas with you. Here’s what they said…

Read more »

two people use AI to examine a house
Stocks for Beginners

Just Released: The 5 Best Stocks to Buy in January 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Let’s cut to the chase: It’s absolutely true that shares of Redfin, an online real estate platform, have fallen 93%…

Read more »

Striking match creates fire and light.
Stocks for Beginners

Just Released: 10 Stocks Every Canadian Should Own in 2023 [PREMIUM PICKS]

Our yearly list of "Starter Stocks" is our attempt to answer a simple question: “Where do I go first?”

Read more »

eat food
Top TSX Stocks

Loblaw Stock – Can it Keep Outperforming in 2023?

Loblaw stock had another great year, but the valuation is getting a tad stretched versus recent historical averages.

Read more »