Canada Goose Holdings Inc.’s Q2 Provides Many Reasons to Stay Away From the Stock

Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (TSX:GOOS)(NYSE:GOOS) released its quarterly results on Thursday, and it reminded me of many reasons I would avoid the premium brand.

| More on:
The Motley Fool
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (TSX:GOOS)(NYSE:GOOS) released its first-quarter results for fiscal 2018 which showed positive sales growth and a smaller loss from a year ago. The company’s revenue totaled $28 million and represents a year-over-year increase of almost 80%. However, the company still produced an operating loss of $14.7 million, which was only slightly improved from a loss of $14.8 million in the prior year.

Canada Goose posted a smaller loss than expected, but there are many reasons why I wouldn’t invest in this company.

Inflating costs

Despite the company seeing gross margins improve from 30% a year ago to 47% in the current period, a 43% increase in selling, general, and administrative costs eroded those additional margins. Canada Goose’s loss before taxes was flat from the prior year, and the improvement in the bottom line came as a result of an increase in income tax recoveries for the current quarter.

Lack of cash flow and poor liquidity

The company continues to struggle to produce cash flow as operating activities depleted the company of $80 million — up from $60 million a year ago. As a result, the company had to borrow over $90 million from its revolving facility. The problem with the additional borrowing is that the company already has a term loan of $136 million, which represents more than Canada Goose’s total equity.

The company paid almost $2.5 million in interest this quarter, more than quadruple the $585,000 it paid last year. If Canada Goose continues to add to its borrowings while failing to see improvements in cash flow, the company could find itself in a difficult situation. Despite Canada Goose having a strong current ratio that sees assets being 4.15 times the size of liabilities, without the high inventory load, that ratio drops to just 0.76.

Accumulating inventories

Canada Goose has been building inventories and, year over year, has seen an increase of over 41% for a total of over $51 million more in inventory this quarter. Although inventory may contribute to the company’s ratio and may make it look more liquid, I’m sure Sears Canada can attest to the difficulty in moving inventory in times of liquidation and being able to get anything close to market value.

High-risk receivables

The company has also seen problems with its receivables and has had to insure over 85% of the money it is owed. The problem I see is that the company’s allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.4 million is almost 15% of its total receivables of $10 million. However, the current quarter’s doubtful allowance is actually an improvement from the previous quarter when the company’s allowance made up over 23% of total receivables.

Premium clothing in a rising rate environment

As interest rates rise, banks will be looking for higher mortgage payments, and that will inevitably lead to smaller budgets for consumers. Perhaps I do not see the vision, but I cannot fathom a scenario where I would need to purchase a $750 winter jacket. Canada can get very cold, and I’ve had the pleasure of shoveling snow the past winter in -30° temperatures, so I can appreciate the importance of warm winter clothing.

The problem is, I can buy adequate clothing in the mall for a fraction of the price of Canada Goose’s apparel and still stay warm without burning my wallet.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor David Jagielski has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

Investing

KM Throwaway Post

Read more »

Investing

Carlos Test Yoast Metadata

Read more »

Investing

KM Ad Test

This is my excerpt.

Read more »

Investing

Test post for affiliate partner mockups

Updated: 9/17/2024. This post was not sponsored. The views and opinions expressed in this review are purely those of the…

Read more »

Investing

Testing Ecap Error

Premium content from Motley Fool Stock Advisor We here at Motley Fool Stock Advisor believe investors should own at least…

Read more »

Investing

TSX Today: Testing the Ad for James

la la la dee dah.

Read more »

Lady holding remote control pointed towards a TV
Investing

2 Streaming Stocks to Buy Now and 1 to Run From

There are streaming stocks on the TSX that are worth paying attention to in 2023 and beyond.

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Stocks for Beginners

Top Recession-Resilient TSX Stocks to Buy With $3,000

It's time to increase your exposure to defensives!

Read more »