Can Baytex Energy Corp. Survive the Latest Oil Slump?

The latest dip in oil brings into question the viability of Baytex Energy Corp.’s (TSX:BTE)(NSYE:BTE) operations.

| More on:
The Motley Fool
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

The latest dip in crude, which saw it fall to its lowest point in seven months, has cast the spotlight firmly back on the energy patch and deeply indebted upstream energy companies that are battling to survive the prolonged oil slump.

One company that continues to garner considerable attention is Baytex Energy Corp. (TSX:BTE)(NYSE:BTE). It is heavily indebted, and the last time oil fell below the US$40 per barrel mark, it shuttered much of its heavy oil production because it wasn’t economic to keep the spigots open.

West Texas Intermediate (WTI) is hovering around US$43 per barrel, which brings into question the future of upstream oil producers should prices remain at that level or even slide lower over a lengthy period. 

Now what?

Baytex’s most critical problem is that its 2017 budget relies upon WTI averaging US$55 per barrel over the course of the year. That forecast emerged from the considerable optimism generated by OPEC’s production cuts, which sparked a recovery in oil.

Despite OPEC and key non-OPEC oil-producing nations agreeing to extend the production cuts, oil has fallen to its lowest level since mid-2017. There are signs that it may remain there or slide below US$40 a barrel. That would be a disaster for Baytex, which needs WTI at US$55 per barrel to be free cash flow positive.

In fact, according to the company’s forecasts, if WTI averages US$50 per barrel or less, then it will be free cash flow negative, which would place greater strain on its already heavily indebted balance sheet. Baytex would also need to significantly slash investments in its drilling and well development program; over the long term, this would cause production to decline further.

We only need to look at its first-quarter 2017 results to see that production declined by almost 9% year over year. That can be attributed to Baytex failing to invest sufficient capital in exploration and development since sharply weak oil prices became the new norm. For a company that has $1.8 billion in debt, this is a significant concern because it will be unable to boost production to generate additional cash flow when oil prices rise.

Nonetheless, Baytex’s position is not as precarious as some pundits believe.

It has a well-laddered debt profile with the first meaningful debt repayment not due until 2021.

Furthermore, the revolving credit facility totaling US$575 million, which falls due in June 2019, can be extended beyond that date by the consent of lenders. That certainly gives Baytex considerable breathing room to wait for oil prices to recover.

It is also worth noting that its Eagle Ford acreage, which is responsible for just over half of its production, has a low breakeven price of a mere US$30 per barrel. This means it remains economic to continue pumping crude from that acreage at current prices and even if crude falls lower.

Baytex’s heavy oil Lloydminster and Peace River assets have breakeven prices of US$40 and US$42 per barrel, respectively, meaning that even with WTI hovering around US$43, those wells are still economic to operate.

So what?

The recent decline in oil certainly is not good news for Baytex, but it is not as dire as some analysts believe. It does, however, underscore the considerable risk that exists when investing in the company.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Matt Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Energy Stocks

Group of industrial workers in a refinery - oil processing equipment and machinery
Energy Stocks

Up by 25%: Is Cenovus Stock a Good Buy in February 2023?

After a powerful bullish run, the energy sector in Canada has finally stabilized, and it might be ripe for a…

Read more »

A worker overlooks an oil refinery plant.
Energy Stocks

Cenovus Stock: Here’s What’s Coming Next

Cenovus stock has rallied strong along with commodity prices. Expect more as the company continues to digest its Husky acquisition.

Read more »

A stock price graph showing growth over time
Energy Stocks

What Share Buybacks Mean for Energy Investors in 2023 and 1 TSX Stock That Could Outperform

Will TSX energy stocks continue to delight investors in 2023?

Read more »

Arrowings ascending on a chalkboard
Energy Stocks

2 Top TSX Energy Stocks That Could Beat Vermilion Energy

TSX energy stocks will likely outperform in 2023. But not all are equally well placed.

Read more »

Gas pipelines
Energy Stocks

Suncor Stock: How High Could it Go in 2023?

Suncor stock is starting off 2023 as an undervalued underdog, but after a record year, the company is standing strong…

Read more »

oil and natural gas
Energy Stocks

Should You Buy Emera Stock in February 2023?

Emera stock has returned 9% compounded annually in the last 10 years, including dividends.

Read more »

grow money, wealth build
Energy Stocks

TFSA: Investing $8,000 in Enbridge Stock Today Could Bring $500 in Tax-Free Dividends

TSX dividend stocks such as Enbridge can be held in a TFSA to allow shareholders generate tax-free dividend income each…

Read more »

oil and natural gas
Energy Stocks

3 TSX Energy Stocks to Buy if the Slump Continues

Three energy stocks trading at depressed prices due to the oil slump are buying opportunities before demand returns.

Read more »