Is Canopy Growth Corp. a Must-Own Stock?

Canopy Growth Corp. (TSX:CGC) is incredibly overvalued. And yet there’s still sound logic behind owning at least a few shares.

| More on:
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

Allow me to start this off by being as clear as possible. An investment in Canopy Growth Corp. (TSX:CGC) today is nothing more than speculation.

The logic goes something like this.

Shares of Canada’s leading marijuana grower currently have a market cap of $1.35 billion, despite posting recent quarterly revenue of just $8.5 million. That gives it a price-to-sales ratio of 47.7, which is insane. Investors aren’t paying 47 times earnings. They’re paying 47 times revenue.

The company has lost money over the last year too, posting a loss of $0.08 per share. Even after adjusting for various non-cash expenses, it still isn’t cash flow positive. It bled $14 million in cash last year from operations alone, while also spending $12 million in capital expenditures.

Even the company’s management knows shares are overvalued, although they’d never admit such a thing publicly. Canopy recently announced it would acquire German marijuana distributor MedCann for nothing more than Canopy shares. In total, if the newly acquired company hits a number of milestones, its owners will receive 1.17 million Canopy shares in the next two years.

When we look at Canopy from every possible investment angle, the conclusion is obvious. Shares are terribly expensive. There’s no correlation between the value of the company today and the share price. Shareholders are blinded by the size of a potential market for legal weed in Canada.

The logic of owning shares anyway

Despite all that, I still think there’s a case for buying Canopy Growth shares today.

When Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT) first hit the public markets in 1970, shares traded hands at $16.50 each. What were profits in 1970? They were just $0.23 per share. The company traded at a price-to-earnings ratio of 71.7–a valuation that seems laughable today. But remember, it was a sexy growth stock back then.

In 1997, Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) had its IPO, raising $48 million at $16 per share. It wasn’t profitable then, and it’s barely profitable now. We all know how an investment in Amazon in 1997 would have worked out.

There are a million other examples where a high valuation worked out very well in the long run, where companies grew so much that paying a premium so early in their lives didn’t matter.

According to reports, the recreational marijuana market in Canada could be worth as much as $10 or $12 billion a year. If Canopy can capture even just part of that, it has the potential to be a truly huge company.

Investors are banking on this hope. Hope isn’t a viable investment strategy. A million things could get between Canopy and its domination of the market. The threat from the world’s tobacco giants is very real, for instance.

But at the same time, it was easy to argue against owning Wal-Mart in 1970 and Amazon in 1997. Each had headwinds. Each conquered those headwinds.

A risky stock like Canopy shouldn’t be a core position in anyone’s portfolio. It’s just too volatile. But there’s certainly a case for making it a tiny, speculative position–a maximum of 1% of assets. If it works out, it would be very profitable. And if it doesn’t, it’s not hard to bounce back from a 1% loss.

The bottom line

When I invest, I try to buy assets worth $1 for 50 cents. Canopy Growth Corp is the exact opposite of that. It’s a loonie that people are happy to pay $5 or $10 for.

There’s the possibility that loonie could be worth so much in the future that it justifies paying $10 for it today. However, investors need to realize that is hardly a sure thing and place their bets accordingly.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Nelson Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. David Gardner owns shares of Amazon.com. The Motley Fool owns shares of Amazon.com.

More on Investing

Investing

KM Throwaway Post

Read more »

Investing

Carlos Test Yoast Metadata

Read more »

Investing

KM Ad Test

This is my excerpt.

Read more »

Investing

Test post for affiliate partner mockups

Updated: 9/17/2024. This post was not sponsored. The views and opinions expressed in this review are purely those of the…

Read more »

Investing

Testing Ecap Error

Premium content from Motley Fool Stock Advisor We here at Motley Fool Stock Advisor believe investors should own at least…

Read more »

Investing

TSX Today: Testing the Ad for James

la la la dee dah.

Read more »

Lady holding remote control pointed towards a TV
Investing

2 Streaming Stocks to Buy Now and 1 to Run From

There are streaming stocks on the TSX that are worth paying attention to in 2023 and beyond.

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Stocks for Beginners

Top Recession-Resilient TSX Stocks to Buy With $3,000

It's time to increase your exposure to defensives!

Read more »