Why You Shouldn’t Discount 4% Yields

Bank of Nova Scotia (TSX:BNS)(NYSE:BNS) didn’t outperform the market in the past decade, but it offered something else…

| More on:
The Motley Fool
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

I recently read a comment that gave me some food for thought. The comment was about Bank of Nova Scotia (TSX:BNS)(NYSE:BNS) and said that in the last 10 years, it hasn’t been able to outperform the market, so there’s no point in considering it as an investment.

In the last decade the bank’s annualized rate of return was 7%, which is considered market performing. However, investors shouldn’t discount Bank of Nova Scotia or other stable dividend payers that yield more than 4% and continue to grow their dividends.

There’s no replacement for income

Just looking at today, Bank of Nova Scotia yields 4.4%, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY), which represents the U.S. stock market, yields 2.6%, and the iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index Fund (TSX:XIU), which represents the Canadian stock market, yields 2.9%.

So, an investment in Bank of Nova Scotia generates 69% more income than an investment in the U.S. stock market and 51% more income than an investment in the Canadian stock market.

There’s no replacement for income. If your monthly phone bill is $60, an annual cost of $720, you can’t pay less than that. To generate $720 of dividends from a 4.4% yield, you need to invest $16,364.

Unfortunately, our supply of money is limited. So, we have to choose where to invest our money. If generating that $720 of annual income is essential, then you’ve got to look for investments with high enough yields.

Income generation comparison

If you had invested $10,000 in Bank of Nova Scotia in November 2006, you would have generated $4,241 of income so far.

The same amount invested in the S&P 500 would have generated $2,150 of income. So, the bank generated 97% more in income in that period.

What’s your goal?

Investors need to ask themselves why they’re investing. Do you want income now? Or are total returns more important?

In different stages of your life, your goals will likely shift. Retiree investors probably want sufficient income to pay the bills today. That income should also be growing to at least keep pace with inflation.

Bank of Nova Scotia is a good candidate for that. It offers a 4.4% yield, and from the fiscal years 2010 to 2015 it hiked its dividend at an annualized rate of almost 6.8%, which more or less doubles the rate of inflation.

Younger investors who have a longer investment horizon might instead invest in high-growth stocks, such as Nike Inc. (NYSE:NKE), which is expected to grow its earnings per share (EPS) at a rate of roughly 15%. Comparatively, Bank of Nova Scotia is expected to grow its EPS by about 7%.

Conclusion

Investors should recognize that Bank of Nova Scotia and Nike are very different investments that play different roles in a diversified portfolio.

Bank of Nova Scotia pays a juicy dividend of more than 4% by paying out half of its earnings. It’s a stable, high-yield, dividend-growth stock.

Nike pays a small yield of about 1%, which is expected to grow at a double-digit rate in alignment with its earnings growth. Most of Nike’s returns are expected to come from a rising share price over time.

Nike is a high-growth, dividend-growth stock with higher risk because it trades at a higher multiple and there’s no way of knowing if it can achieve its high double-digit earnings growth.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Kay Ng owns shares of Nike and The Bank of Nova Scotia. The Motley Fool owns shares of Nike.

More on Dividend Stocks

growing plant shoots on stacked coins
Dividend Stocks

5 Dividend Stocks to Buy With Yields Upwards of 5%

These five companies all earn tonnes of cash flow, making them some of the best long-term dividend stocks you can…

Read more »

funds, money, nest egg
Dividend Stocks

TFSA Investors: 3 Stocks to Start Building an Influx of Passive Income

A TFSA is the ideal registered account for passive income, as it doesn't weigh down your tax bill, and any…

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Dividend Stocks

3 of the Safest Dividend Stocks in Canada

Royal Bank of Canada stock is one of the safest TSX dividend stocks to buy. So is CT REIT and…

Read more »

Growing plant shoots on coins
Dividend Stocks

1 of the Top Canadian Growth Stocks to Buy in February 2023

Many top Canadian growth stocks represent strong underlying businesses, healthy financials, and organic growth opportunities.

Read more »

stock research, analyze data
Dividend Stocks

Wherever the Market Goes, I’m Buying These 3 TSX Stocks

Here are three TSX stocks that could outperform irrespective of the market direction.

Read more »

woman data analyze
Dividend Stocks

1 Oversold Dividend Stock (Yielding 6.5%) to Buy This Month

Here's why SmartCentres REIT (TSX:SRU.UN) is one top dividend stock that long-term investors should consider in this current market.

Read more »

IMAGE OF A NOTEBOOK WITH TFSA WRITTEN ON IT
Dividend Stocks

Better TFSA Buy: Enbridge Stock or Bank of Nova Scotia

Enbridge and Bank of Nova Scotia offer high yields for TFSA investors seeking passive income. Is one stock now undervalued?

Read more »

Golden crown on a red velvet background
Dividend Stocks

2 Top Stocks Just Became Canadian Dividend Aristocrats

These two top Canadian Dividend Aristocrats stocks are reliable companies with impressive long-term growth potential.

Read more »