Are Investors Mispricing TransAlta Corporation?

While shares of TransAlta Corporation (TSX:TA)(NYSE:TAC) are certainly cheap, this company seems like a slow death waiting to happen. I would avoid it.

| More on:
The Motley Fool
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

It’s easy to look at companies like TransAlta Corporation (TSX:TA)(NYSE:TAC) and question whether or not investors are mispricing the stock, especially considering how beaten down the stock has been over the past year. However, TransAlta is not an immediate buy, and there are a few reasons for that.

The primary reason has to do with the fact that 20% of its total energy production is sold on the whims of the market. There has been an oversupply and lack of demand, pushing prices down, which has resulted in the company generating losses.

For example, its 2015 earnings showed that it lost $0.09/share; its EBITDA is down by 9% year over year and its cash flow from operations is down a whopping 40%. Naturally, with losses coming in, TransAlta was forced to make a move no company wants to do: it cut its dividend.

Yet it had no choice. The company used to pay out $0.185 per share a quarter. However, to ensure it could stay operational, the company cut it to only $0.035. While that still means the company yields 2.33%, it’s a long way from the five times dividend it used to pay.

But here’s why the company really has me concerned: 40% of TransAlta’s EBITDA is generated from coal-fired power plants in Alberta. This is problematic because Alberta just elected an NDP government, which mandated that all electricity generated in the province be coal free by 2030; in other words, 40% of TransAlta’s EBITDA won’t be allowed to exist in 14 years.

This means the company will have no choice but to shut down power plants that might still be worth operating. For example, it has invested $3 billion along with Capital Power Corp. to bring Keephills-3 plant online. By 2030, it’ll be forced to shut down well before the plant would have run its course, limiting any profits either company can make.

To make matters worse, TransAlta has borrowed a significant amount of money to invest in these growth projects. It has $4.3 billion in debt with $1.6 billion due in the next three years. If that weren’t enough, a vast majority of the debt is in U.S. dollars, so when that currency increases, the debt becomes that much harder to pay back.

What about renewables?

There is one saving grace for TransAlta, and that’s the fact that it owns a controlling interest (64%) in TransAlta Renewables Inc. (TSX:RNW). This is a 2013 spin off of all of TransAlta’s renewable projects.

At present-day value, TransAlta Renewables has a market cap of $2.96 billion. That means that TransAlta’s holding of its renewable subsidiary is worth $1.89 billion. That’s significant because TransAlta itself only has a market cap of $1.98 billion. In other words, investors are only valuing the non-renewables business at $90 million.

Operating cash flow for 2016 is expected to be anywhere from $250 to $300 million, of which a percentage is expected to come from the renewables. However, the rest will still come from TransAlta’s legacy operations, making the company very cheap.

Here’s the thing, though…

If the dividend were still really strong, I could argue that buying this company would be worth the money. However, knowing that the government has plans to make coal obsolete, I would wait to see how TransAlta can innovate beyond coal. Frankly, I would just buy the renewables division. It’s very much the future.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Jacob Donnelly has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Energy Stocks

Group of industrial workers in a refinery - oil processing equipment and machinery
Energy Stocks

Up by 25%: Is Cenovus Stock a Good Buy in February 2023?

After a powerful bullish run, the energy sector in Canada has finally stabilized, and it might be ripe for a…

Read more »

A worker overlooks an oil refinery plant.
Energy Stocks

Cenovus Stock: Here’s What’s Coming Next

Cenovus stock has rallied strong along with commodity prices. Expect more as the company continues to digest its Husky acquisition.

Read more »

A stock price graph showing growth over time
Energy Stocks

What Share Buybacks Mean for Energy Investors in 2023 and 1 TSX Stock That Could Outperform

Will TSX energy stocks continue to delight investors in 2023?

Read more »

Arrowings ascending on a chalkboard
Energy Stocks

2 Top TSX Energy Stocks That Could Beat Vermilion Energy

TSX energy stocks will likely outperform in 2023. But not all are equally well placed.

Read more »

Gas pipelines
Energy Stocks

Suncor Stock: How High Could it Go in 2023?

Suncor stock is starting off 2023 as an undervalued underdog, but after a record year, the company is standing strong…

Read more »

oil and natural gas
Energy Stocks

Should You Buy Emera Stock in February 2023?

Emera stock has returned 9% compounded annually in the last 10 years, including dividends.

Read more »

grow money, wealth build
Energy Stocks

TFSA: Investing $8,000 in Enbridge Stock Today Could Bring $500 in Tax-Free Dividends

TSX dividend stocks such as Enbridge can be held in a TFSA to allow shareholders generate tax-free dividend income each…

Read more »

oil and natural gas
Energy Stocks

3 TSX Energy Stocks to Buy if the Slump Continues

Three energy stocks trading at depressed prices due to the oil slump are buying opportunities before demand returns.

Read more »