Why I’m Still Staying Far Away From Home Capital Group Inc.

There are some massive issues surrounding Home Capital Group Inc. (TSX:HCG) after disclosing to investors that 11% of last year’s loans may be fraudulent.

| More on:
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

On Wednesday afternoon Home Capital Group Inc. (TSX:HCG), made two separate announcements.

In the first one, the company gave more details about its previous announcement about severing ties with many of its mortgage broker partners. In all, the company has now told 45 different brokers they’re not interested in doing business with them any longer after a third party informed Home Capital’s management that some of the loans these individuals brokered may have been given to borrowers with falsified income.

Additionally, Home Capital also released its second-quarter numbers. For the most part, results were in line with last year, with the company earning $1.03 per share on total revenue of just over $250 million. Last year the company earned $1.05 per share on revenue of $255 million.

But those numbers are less than what investors have come to expect. Throughout 2015 management has maintained that the expected growth rate of the bottom line would be between 8-13%. After these lackluster results, it seems pretty obvious that the company’s days of double-digit growth are behind it, at least for now.

While the results aren’t exactly encouraging, it’s the mortgage fraud allegations that really concern me about Home Capital.

A loss in confidence?

For those of you somewhat unfamiliar with Home Capital Group, the company’s model is simple. It mostly lends money to folks who are still decent borrowers, but have been rejected by more traditional lenders. Many of its borrowers are recent immigrants and people who are self-employed.

The biggest concern about lending to these people is always going to be default risk. After all, there’s a reason why Canada’s largest lenders aren’t terribly interested in these niche borrowers. Home Capital has always countered this criticism by reassuring investors that it has high underwriting standards. This confidence was a huge part of the business.

There’s another reason why Home Capital needs to make sure there’s confidence in its underwriting. The company borrows heavily in the bond market to be able to finance these loans, taking the interest spread as its profit. If investors no longer have faith in the company, the cost to borrow money will go higher.

At that point, the company has two options. It can either keep rates to borrowers the same and take less profits, or it can raise rates to borrowers, which might cause new loan originations to plunge. Neither of those situations are ideal.

Digging a little deeper into the fraud case shows it was a pretty big deal. Although the company only cut ties with 45 of its 3,000 mortgage broker partners, those brokers were responsible for a lot of business. In 2014 the group sent $960 million in mortgages to the company out of a total of $7.6 billion. Needless to say, one-eighth of the total loans originated during a whole year is a pretty big problem.

The bigger issue is the problem it creates with sentiment. Suddenly, it’s very obvious Home Capital’s underwriting standards aren’t nearly as good as it thought. And the worst part? Somebody else had to tip the company off. It didn’t even find out about this massive fraud on its own.

Even if these brokers were the only people abusing Home Capital’s underwriting loopholes, the current situation still represents a massive problem for the company. When a leveraged financial loses the confidence of the market, there’s no telling what the consequences might be. That’s the big issue with Home Capital, and that’s why it’s still not a buy at under seven times earnings.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Nelson Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

Investing

KM Throwaway Post

Read more »

Investing

Carlos Test Yoast Metadata

Read more »

Investing

KM Ad Test

This is my excerpt.

Read more »

Investing

Test post for affiliate partner mockups

Updated: 9/17/2024. This post was not sponsored. The views and opinions expressed in this review are purely those of the…

Read more »

Investing

Testing Ecap Error

Premium content from Motley Fool Stock Advisor We here at Motley Fool Stock Advisor believe investors should own at least…

Read more »

Investing

TSX Today: Testing the Ad for James

la la la dee dah.

Read more »

Lady holding remote control pointed towards a TV
Investing

2 Streaming Stocks to Buy Now and 1 to Run From

There are streaming stocks on the TSX that are worth paying attention to in 2023 and beyond.

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Stocks for Beginners

Top Recession-Resilient TSX Stocks to Buy With $3,000

It's time to increase your exposure to defensives!

Read more »