Should You Buy First Quantum Minerals Limited or Teck Resources Ltd.?

Picking a good mining investment right now is a daunting task. Here we compare and contrast First Quantum Minerals Limited (TSX:FM) and Teck Resources Ltd. (TSX:TCK.B)(NYSE:TCK). Should you buy either?

| More on:
The Motley Fool
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

Right now isn’t the best time for the miners. Low commodity prices across the board are impacting these companies’ bottom lines, but are there any good investment picks in the sector? Lets take a look at First Quantum Minerals Limited (TSX:FM) and Teck Resources Ltd. (TSX:TCK.B)(NYSE:TCK) to see if an investment in either stock makes sense.

First Quantum Minerals

First Quantum Minerals’ primary asset is copper, but the company also has exposure to nickel, gold, zinc, and platinum group elements. The company recently posted its Q4 2014 earnings, and to much surprise, it beat analysts’ expectations on profit, thanks to increased copper output and lower production costs.

Teck Resources

Teck is Canada’s largest diversified miner, but its main asset is metallurgical coal. Teck’s other assets include copper, zinc, and energy.

Who has the best products?

Primary commodities for both companies are seeing tough times right now, but the long-term forecast for each product is promising. It’s a tough pick to choose between the most promising commodities (metallurgical coal or copper), but if you are hedging your bets on the company with the best commodities, I like the fact that First Quantum has both base and precious metals. Teck’s exposure to energy and base metals is a bit of a drawback.

Track records

Teck Resources is having a good year so far, with the stock up almost 9% since the first trading day of 2015. However, if you look at the long-term performance, the company has consistently disappointed its shareholders, with the stock down 59% in the last five years and 24% in the past 10 years.

Teck Resources is suffering from low prices for most of the commodities it produces, yet the stock still has experienced some recent strength. A great deal of this strength is being attributed to a lower Canadian dollar, which makes the company’s Canadian operations more profitable. In addition, the company has been effective in some recent cost-cutting measures, which have enhanced profitability.

First Quantum Minerals is down almost 9% this year and down 12% in the last five years, but up an astonishing 215% in the last 10 years. Clearly, the company is experiencing some near-term weakness, which can be attributed to a weak copper market and operational challenges that the company is facing.

Financials

Teck’s 2014 full-year results were mixed. Gross profit before depreciation and amortization was $2.9 billion compared with $3.7 billion in the prior year. The big positive was that the company closed the year with a cash balance of $2.0 billion.

First Quantum’s latest results were surprisingly positive. The concerning thing here is the company is over-leveraged with a large amount of debt.

Who should you buy?

In this situation it really is a toss-up. For Teck Resources, improving near-term financials and solid operating results are a positive. But concerns circulate around the fact that the company has consistently underperformed across a variety of economic climates.

On the other hand, First Quantum Minerals’ most recent results were inconsistent, and the company’s stock hit a five-year low early in the year due to concerns about taxation in its Zambian operations. While earnings were mixed, the main concern I have when it comes to First Quantum is the company’s rising debt. Rising debt in a low-price environment can be disastrous.

In the end, choosing one the two companies to buy is a hard choice. I’m more inclined to sit out of both stocks for now.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Leia Klingel has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

Investing

KM Throwaway Post

Read more »

Investing

Carlos Test Yoast Metadata

Read more »

Investing

KM Ad Test

This is my excerpt.

Read more »

Investing

Test post for affiliate partner mockups

Updated: 9/17/2024. This post was not sponsored. The views and opinions expressed in this review are purely those of the…

Read more »

Investing

Testing Ecap Error

Premium content from Motley Fool Stock Advisor We here at Motley Fool Stock Advisor believe investors should own at least…

Read more »

Investing

TSX Today: Testing the Ad for James

la la la dee dah.

Read more »

Lady holding remote control pointed towards a TV
Investing

2 Streaming Stocks to Buy Now and 1 to Run From

There are streaming stocks on the TSX that are worth paying attention to in 2023 and beyond.

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Stocks for Beginners

Top Recession-Resilient TSX Stocks to Buy With $3,000

It's time to increase your exposure to defensives!

Read more »