1 Critical Fact Americans Don’t Understand About the Keystone XL Pipeline

In the debate about TransCanada Corporation’s (TSX:TRP)(NYSE:TRP) Keystone XL pipeline, many Americans fail to grasp the fact that the oil that would flow south is desperately needed by its refineries.

| More on:
The Motley Fool
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

Last week U.S. President Obama vetoed a bill that would have approved the construction of TransCanada Corporation’s (TSX:TRP)(NYSE:TRP) Keystone XL pipeline project. In doing so, he sent the political hot potato back to the U.S. Congress, which is still a handful of votes shy of having the power to override the president’s veto.

However, while lawmakers play a game of hot potato, the average American is beginning to wonder if the country even needs the pipeline. The U.S. has an abundance of oil, thanks to the shale revolution, but this is leading many to see the Keystone XL pipeline as an export pipeline, as oil would flow through the heartland of America and out from its Gulf Coast. That belief, which is leading many to turn against the project, is based on a misunderstanding of one critical fact: American refineries were configured with Canadian oil in mind.

A heavy burden to bear

America hasn’t built a new complex refinery since 1977. Instead, the country has only expanded the capacity of existing complex refineries to handle the country’s growing need for gasoline and diesel. One of the ways it has expanded its capacity is by adding what are called coking units, which can upgrade heavier crude oil into petroleum products like gasoline and diesel.

However, what few people realize is that the main reason why U.S. refineries built coking units was to handle the heavier crude oil that was supposed to come from places like Canada and Venezuela, as the country wanted to desperately get off of the light oil that had been coming from the Middle East.

What no one saw coming was the U.S. shale revolution, which brought enormous quantities of light oil that flooded the U.S. market. It has pretty much displaced light oil imports from places like the Middle East. However, what it can’t replace is the fact that American refineries were configured to handle heavy oil. That’s why heavy oil imports continue to grow.

A pipeline to the Promised Land

This is especially true in the U.S. Gulf Coast, which built a tremendous amount of coking capacity to handle heavier oil. We can see this in the following map from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Refining capacity

Source: EIA.

Note on that map that most of America’s heavy oil refining capacity is either in the Mid-West, near the Oklahoma oil storage center where the Keystone XL pipeline would actually terminate, as well as in the Gulf Coast, where the southern leg of Keystone takes oil to the Gulf. It’s pretty clear from that map that the Keystone XL pipeline is being developed to take heavy Canadian oil to the refineries that are best equipped to refine that oil. In fact, there’s so much heavy oil refining capacity in the Gulf that the Keystone XL would bring it less than 10% of the oil the region needs.

Investor takeaway

The Keystone XL has become a political issue in America because few on either side of the border have any real understanding of the energy industry. So, when someone says the Keystone XL is just an export pipeline, they don’t understand the fact that America really does need Canada’s oil because that’s the type of oil their refineries were configured to handle.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Matt DiLallo has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Energy Stocks

Group of industrial workers in a refinery - oil processing equipment and machinery
Energy Stocks

Up by 25%: Is Cenovus Stock a Good Buy in February 2023?

After a powerful bullish run, the energy sector in Canada has finally stabilized, and it might be ripe for a…

Read more »

A worker overlooks an oil refinery plant.
Energy Stocks

Cenovus Stock: Here’s What’s Coming Next

Cenovus stock has rallied strong along with commodity prices. Expect more as the company continues to digest its Husky acquisition.

Read more »

A stock price graph showing growth over time
Energy Stocks

What Share Buybacks Mean for Energy Investors in 2023 and 1 TSX Stock That Could Outperform

Will TSX energy stocks continue to delight investors in 2023?

Read more »

Arrowings ascending on a chalkboard
Energy Stocks

2 Top TSX Energy Stocks That Could Beat Vermilion Energy

TSX energy stocks will likely outperform in 2023. But not all are equally well placed.

Read more »

Gas pipelines
Energy Stocks

Suncor Stock: How High Could it Go in 2023?

Suncor stock is starting off 2023 as an undervalued underdog, but after a record year, the company is standing strong…

Read more »

oil and natural gas
Energy Stocks

Should You Buy Emera Stock in February 2023?

Emera stock has returned 9% compounded annually in the last 10 years, including dividends.

Read more »

grow money, wealth build
Energy Stocks

TFSA: Investing $8,000 in Enbridge Stock Today Could Bring $500 in Tax-Free Dividends

TSX dividend stocks such as Enbridge can be held in a TFSA to allow shareholders generate tax-free dividend income each…

Read more »

oil and natural gas
Energy Stocks

3 TSX Energy Stocks to Buy if the Slump Continues

Three energy stocks trading at depressed prices due to the oil slump are buying opportunities before demand returns.

Read more »