Despite Beating Expectations, Investors Should Avoid First Quantum Minerals Ltd.

The bad news is never-ending for investors of First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (TSX:FM), with weak industry fundamentals and operational issues threatening a breach of debt covenants.

| More on:
The Motley Fool
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

What: Canadian metals miner First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (TSX:FM) saw its share price move marginally higher after it released its fourth-quarter results late last week.

First Quantum surprisingly beat expectations for its fourth-quarter 2014 financial results, posting a profit that was higher than analyst estimates on the back of increased copper output and lower production costs. This has been the key driver that has lifted its share price marginally in recent days.

So what: There are signs that First Quantum’s future is not as rosy as some analysts believe these results indicate.

The largest consumer of base metals, including copper, globally is China, and its economy is currently facing stiff headwinds that threaten to derail growth. These headwinds will have a significant impact on First Quantum, which derives 72% of its revenue from copper. A significant proportion of the remaining revenue is derived from other base metals, including zinc and nickel.

China has overbuilt, and activity in its construction sector continues to decline. Investment and activity in real estate development for December 2014 declined for the 12th straight month, and analysts expect this trend to continue; it is estimated that up to 28% of housing stock remains vacant.

Another threat to the demand for copper is declining industrial activity, with the metal being a key component in a range of industrial processes. Industrial activity in China, the world’s single largest manufacturing economy, contracted in January 2015.  This was the fourth consecutive month where industrial activity declined.

It will also be some time before there is an uptick in manufacturing and construction activity in the Eurozone, which is still caught in a deep structural economic slump, despite the ECB’s stimulus plan.

On top of these threats, First Quantum is experiencing other problems that will impact its financial performance. These include changes to Zambian taxation laws that saw royalty rates for open pit mines more than triple from 6% to 20%. This will cause First Quantum’s royalty costs to increase significantly because its Kansanshi mine in Zambia is responsible for around 60% of its total copper production. The end result will be declining cash flows from that mine and an overall higher cost base for its operations.

Now what: These issues, as well as softer copper prices, threaten the company’s ability to meet the net-debt to EBITDA covenants on three of its credit facilities, totaling $3.5 billion. This has forced it to reduce capital expenditures and implement a range of measures to reduce costs. This is certainly a red flag for investors, because if copper prices collapse further, the company’s existence could be threatened.

The poor industry fundamentals for base metals miners created by declining construction and industrial activity in China have already had a significant impact on copper prices. Earlier this year copper hit a five-and-a-half year low and with China’s economy continuing to slow, I don’t anticipate a strong rebound any time soon.

I believe the company does not offer investors any significant upside from current levels. It makes better sense for investors to look elsewhere for superior returns.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Matt Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Metals and Mining Stocks

tsx today
Metals and Mining Stocks

TSX Today: What to Watch for in Stocks on Tuesday, February 14

U.S. inflation data and more corporate earnings could keep TSX stocks highly volatile today.

Read more »

A miner down a mine shaft
Metals and Mining Stocks

Are Hydrogen Stocks or Lithium Stocks Better for Long-Term Investors?

Hydrogen and lithium stocks are excellent options in for long-term plays but remain speculative investments, according to some market analysts.

Read more »

People walk into a dark underground mine.
Metals and Mining Stocks

3 Top Mining Stocks in Canada to Buy in February 2023

Three Canadian mining stocks are attractive prospects for growth investors in February 2023.

Read more »

Gold bars
Metals and Mining Stocks

Better Buy: Barrick Gold Stock or Kinross Gold?

Here are some key reasons why I find Barrick Gold more attractive than Kinross Gold for long-term investors with a…

Read more »

People walk into a dark underground mine.
Metals and Mining Stocks

This Mineral Company Was on the Move in January 2023

While inflation is easing, this mineral company's stock is rising. How can you make money in this mineral stock?

Read more »

gold stocks gold mining
Metals and Mining Stocks

Is Now the Time to Buy Gold Stocks?

Gold prices can continue to rally throughout 2023, as inflation and interest rates peak, making undervalued gold stocks some of…

Read more »

tsx today
Metals and Mining Stocks

TSX Today: What to Watch for in Stocks on Thursday, February 9

As the ongoing corporate earnings season heats up, TSX stocks may remain volatile.

Read more »

A worker wears a hard hat outside a mining operation.
Metals and Mining Stocks

Cameco Stock Is Approaching its 52-Week High: Time to Invest?

Cameco (TSX:CCO) stock is nearing 52-week highs once more after falling from September last year, but should you wait for…

Read more »