The Secret That Barrick Gold Doesn’t Want You to Know

Barrick, as well as its peers, is obscuring some very valuable information about production costs. So should you just buy a gold ETF instead?

| More on:
The Motley Fool

There is a constant debate raging among gold enthusiasts about which is better: buying gold mining stocks, or buying a gold ETF? To answer that question, one has to answer a few other questions about the miners. How much do they mine? Are their productions growing? What do their balance sheets look like? How much does it cost them to produce an ounce of gold?

This last question is crucial, but very difficult to answer, and this is no accident. Let me explain, using Barrick Gold (TSX: ABX)(NYSE: ABX) as an example.

How much does it cost?

Just looking at Barrick’s annual report is enough to make someone’s head spin. The company presents no less than three different ways to measure unit costs: adjusted operating costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce, and all-in costs per ounce.

Here’s what I would like to know instead. One, how much does it cost to find an ounce? Two, how much does it cost to dig it out of the ground? Finding that exact information in Barrick’s numbers is not easy.

What happens if one just uses the final number, “all-in costs” per ounce? After all, production is not growing at Barrick, so every dollar the company spends seems to be in an effort to maintain its current output. Well, that number was about $1,300 last year. This is where the price of gold is today. So there’s a very good chance that gold prices need to rise for Barrick to be profitable at all.

The same at other companies

Looking at other companies tells a similar story. For example, Kinross Gold (TSX: K)(NYSE: KGC) reports a number for “attributable production cost of sales from continuing operations per equivalent ounce sold” and “attributable all-in sustaining cost from continuing operations per equivalent ounce sold”. Is this confusing enough?

Kinross emphasizes the second number, implying that it is the most important one. However, that number excludes more than half of capital expenditures. Like Barrick, Kinross isn’t growing — so why are so many costs excluded? Unlike Barrick, Kinross doesn’t even present an “all-in costs” number. If it did, it would come in at over $1,350.

So what should you do?

It’s quite simple. If you think the price of gold is going to rise, then buy a gold ETF. Two options are the Claymore Gold Bullion ETF (TSX: CGL) and the iShares Gold Trust (TSX: IGT)(NYSE: IAU). With either of these options, you don’t have to worry about
confusing annual reports or skyrocketing costs.

If you’d rather invest in stocks, you should avoid gold altogether.

Fool contributor Benjamin Sinclair has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

Investing

test

test Tired of guessing which stocks to buy? When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to…

Read more »

Investing

Test

Tired of guessing which stocks to buy? When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen.…

Read more »

ways to boost income
Dividend Stocks

An 8.12%-Yield Dividend Stock That Could Benefit After Recent Bank of Canada Rate Cuts

Telus (TSX:T) stock is a dirt-cheap bargain after recent rate cuts, even amid considerable industry challenges.

Read more »

Close up of an egg in a nest of twigs on grass with RRSP written on it symbolizing a RRSP contribution.
Retirement

This Finance Stock Could Be the Cornerstone of Your RRSP

Sun Life Financial is a durable, global insurance growth stock that fits perfectly as an RRSP cornerstone, offering steady dividends…

Read more »

Two seniors walk in the forest
Dividend Stocks

Steps to Take if CPP Is Partial Replacement of Pre-Retirement Income

Canadians have ways or can take steps to fill the CPP’s shortfall and boost retirement income.

Read more »

Man meditating in lotus position outdoor on patio
Stocks for Beginners

Patient Investors: Why These Stocks Could Return Multiples Over a Decade

Two TSX stocks with recurring revenue could quietly multiply wealth over the next decade.

Read more »

dividend growth for passive income
Dividend Stocks

A Lucrative Growth Stock I’d Buy for 2026

Gildan Activewear stock is a top TSX stock you can own in 2025, given its steady revenue and earnings growth…

Read more »

Business success of growth metaverse finance and investment profit graph concept or development analysis progress chart on financial market achievement strategy background with increase hand diagram
Dividend Stocks

Long-Term Investing: 2 Stocks That Could Turn $10,000 Into $100,000

Do you want to turn $10,000 into $100,000? Cargojet and Brookfield show how scalable businesses, reinvested profits, and patience can…

Read more »