The Secret That Barrick Gold Doesn’t Want You to Know

Barrick, as well as its peers, is obscuring some very valuable information about production costs. So should you just buy a gold ETF instead?

| More on:
The Motley Fool
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

There is a constant debate raging among gold enthusiasts about which is better: buying gold mining stocks, or buying a gold ETF? To answer that question, one has to answer a few other questions about the miners. How much do they mine? Are their productions growing? What do their balance sheets look like? How much does it cost them to produce an ounce of gold?

This last question is crucial, but very difficult to answer, and this is no accident. Let me explain, using Barrick Gold (TSX: ABX)(NYSE: ABX) as an example.

How much does it cost?

Just looking at Barrick’s annual report is enough to make someone’s head spin. The company presents no less than three different ways to measure unit costs: adjusted operating costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce, and all-in costs per ounce.

Here’s what I would like to know instead. One, how much does it cost to find an ounce? Two, how much does it cost to dig it out of the ground? Finding that exact information in Barrick’s numbers is not easy.

What happens if one just uses the final number, “all-in costs” per ounce? After all, production is not growing at Barrick, so every dollar the company spends seems to be in an effort to maintain its current output. Well, that number was about $1,300 last year. This is where the price of gold is today. So there’s a very good chance that gold prices need to rise for Barrick to be profitable at all.

The same at other companies

Looking at other companies tells a similar story. For example, Kinross Gold (TSX: K)(NYSE: KGC) reports a number for “attributable production cost of sales from continuing operations per equivalent ounce sold” and “attributable all-in sustaining cost from continuing operations per equivalent ounce sold”. Is this confusing enough?

Kinross emphasizes the second number, implying that it is the most important one. However, that number excludes more than half of capital expenditures. Like Barrick, Kinross isn’t growing — so why are so many costs excluded? Unlike Barrick, Kinross doesn’t even present an “all-in costs” number. If it did, it would come in at over $1,350.

So what should you do?

It’s quite simple. If you think the price of gold is going to rise, then buy a gold ETF. Two options are the Claymore Gold Bullion ETF (TSX: CGL) and the iShares Gold Trust (TSX: IGT)(NYSE: IAU). With either of these options, you don’t have to worry about
confusing annual reports or skyrocketing costs.

If you’d rather invest in stocks, you should avoid gold altogether.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Benjamin Sinclair has no position in any stocks mentioned.

More on Investing

Investing

Pitch Braze Ad

This is my excerpt.

Read more »

Investing

KM Throwaway Post

Before Fool Braze Ad Mid-Article-Pitch The sun dipped low on the horizon, casting long, golden shadows across the quiet park.…

Read more »

Investing

Carlos Test Yoast Metadata

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut…

Read more »

Investing

KM Ad Test

This is my excerpt.

Read more »

Investing

Test post for affiliate partner mockups

Updated: 9/17/2024. This post was not sponsored. The views and opinions expressed in this review are purely those of the…

Read more »

Investing

Testing Ecap Error

Premium content from Motley Fool Stock Advisor We here at Motley Fool Stock Advisor believe investors should own at least…

Read more »

Investing

TSX Today: Testing the Ad for James

la la la dee dah.

Read more »

Lady holding remote control pointed towards a TV
Investing

2 Streaming Stocks to Buy Now and 1 to Run From

There are streaming stocks on the TSX that are worth paying attention to in 2023 and beyond.

Read more »