3 More Stocks to Avoid Forever

These stocks don’t belong in anyone’s portfolio.

| More on:
The Motley Fool
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

An earlier article highlighted three stocks that you should never buy. The three companies had either weak management, a weak moat, or an astronomically high price.

Below are three companies that you should also cross off your watch list, all for one simple reason: they are uncompetitive. While they all trade at fairly cheap valuations, there is a good reason for that. And they could all become much cheaper in a hurry.

1. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Corporation (TSX: LIF) makes all its money from the Iron Ore Company of Canada, which produces iron ore in Labrador. Of all commodities, perhaps the scariest one to invest in is iron ore. There are two reasons for this: an unstable end market, and tough competition.

Iron ore is used exclusively to make steel, 50% of which is consumed by China. Steel is mainly used in the construction of buildings, which has been the main fuel in China’s growth, especially in the last five years. But there are numerous signs that China is in the midst of a property bubble, and if the construction stops, then world demand for steel will plummet. And that would bring down iron ore prices too.

The iron ore market is dominated by BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto, and Vale. All three are able to produce iron ore much more cheaply than LIORC. So if iron ore prices plummet, the mining giants will easily outlast LIORC. Worst of all, these companies are planning major production expansions.

2. Indigo

Like LIORC, Indigo (TSX: IDG) competes against a much larger rival that operates at a much lower cost: Amazon. But unlike the mining giants, Amazon makes a constant effort to keep prices as low as possible, in an effort to wound its competitors.

And that is what has done to so many, including Indigo. Through the first three quarters of 2014, the company has lost nearly $17 million. Will the story get better? It could, but one only needs to look back at what happened to Borders to see what could be in Indigo’s future.

3. Iamgold

If gold prices go back to $1,900 per ounce, which is where they were in 2011, perhaps no company will benefit more than Iamgold (TSX: IMG)(NYSE: IAG). This is because the company is one of Canada’s highest cost gold producers. The company doesn’t admit this easily, but the numbers tell the story.

In 2013, the company reported “cash costs” of $801/oz for the year. But all-in sustaining costs at its gold mines were north of $1,200, and that does not include “development/expansion” costs of $485 per ounce of production. Worst of all, Iamgold’s reserves actually decreased during the year, making one wonder whether those expansion costs really should be classified as such.

In fact the company’s free cash flow in 2013 was negative $371 million, in a year when gold prices averaged $1,400. So unless gold prices recover dramatically, Iamgold will continue to bleed cash.

Foolish bottom line

Any of these investments could conceivably turn out really well. If China reaccelerates, Indigo receives a buyout offer, or gold prices spike, these three companies will be fine. But that is not a gamble worth taking. You’re better off staying on the sidelines.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool contributor Benjamin Sinclair holds no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. David Gardner owns shares of Amazon.com. The Motley Fool owns shares of Amazon.com.

More on Investing

Investing

KM Throwaway Post

Read more »

Investing

Carlos Test Yoast Metadata

Read more »

Investing

KM Ad Test

This is my excerpt.

Read more »

Investing

Test post for affiliate partner mockups

Updated: 9/17/2024. This post was not sponsored. The views and opinions expressed in this review are purely those of the…

Read more »

Investing

Testing Ecap Error

Premium content from Motley Fool Stock Advisor We here at Motley Fool Stock Advisor believe investors should own at least…

Read more »

Investing

TSX Today: Testing the Ad for James

la la la dee dah.

Read more »

Lady holding remote control pointed towards a TV
Investing

2 Streaming Stocks to Buy Now and 1 to Run From

There are streaming stocks on the TSX that are worth paying attention to in 2023 and beyond.

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Stocks for Beginners

Top Recession-Resilient TSX Stocks to Buy With $3,000

It's time to increase your exposure to defensives!

Read more »