The Secret that Scotiabank and CIBC Don’t Want You to Know

How to avoid unnecessary trading fees.

| More on:
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

When investing, it is very important to keep track of fees. Because if you don’t, they can eat into your returns without you realizing it. The banks make a lot of money every year off of fees, much of which comes from careless investors.

So the banks have plenty of incentive to keep their fees out of plain view. And when trading stocks, these fees can make a dramatic difference in returns.

Not that long ago, all of the banks charged roughly $30 per trade unless you had a big balance or you were a very active trader. Then a lot of smaller websites started popping up, offering trades for as little as $5 to everyone. Slowly but surely, the banks have lowered their fees as well. But two banks have barely budged: Bank of Nova Scotia (TSX: BNS)(NYSE: BNS) and CIBC (TSX: CM)(NYSE: CM).

While the other four big banks offer $10 trades to everyone, Bank of Nova Scotia charges up to $25 per trade, and CIBC up to $28. Only when the account balance exceeds $50,000 or there are numerous trades in a quarter, do these banks offer $10 trades.

So what would these fees do to your returns? Let’s consider a hypothetical example.

Suppose you have two investors: Mike and John. Each starts with $25,000 to invest and wants to hold 25 stocks. Each of them holds on to a company’s stock for an average of two years. And the stocks return 8% per year. The only difference is that Mike invests with RBC (TSX: RY)(NYSE: RY) and John with CIBC. How much money will each have after 10 years?

Investor Value in 10 Years Real Return
Mike (RBC) $49,971 7.17%
John (CIBC) $42,711 5.5%

You can see that Mike ends up with $7,000 more than John after 10 years, even though they have the exact same strategy and stock-picking ability. Mike also returns 1.67 percentage points more than John every year.

Foolish bottom line

This is a fairly simplified example, but it demonstrates the effect that fees can have on your portfolio. In fact fees can eat into your portfolio’s returns even more than a few lousy stock picks. But this is not something that CIBC or Scotiabank will tell you up front. Unless you can get their reduced fees, it’s best to avoid these services altogether.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

More on Investing

Investing

KM Throwaway Post

Read more »

Investing

Carlos Test Yoast Metadata

Read more »

Investing

KM Ad Test

This is my excerpt.

Read more »

Investing

Test post for affiliate partner mockups

Updated: 9/17/2024. This post was not sponsored. The views and opinions expressed in this review are purely those of the…

Read more »

Investing

Testing Ecap Error

Premium content from Motley Fool Stock Advisor We here at Motley Fool Stock Advisor believe investors should own at least…

Read more »

Investing

TSX Today: Testing the Ad for James

la la la dee dah.

Read more »

Lady holding remote control pointed towards a TV
Investing

2 Streaming Stocks to Buy Now and 1 to Run From

There are streaming stocks on the TSX that are worth paying attention to in 2023 and beyond.

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Stocks for Beginners

Top Recession-Resilient TSX Stocks to Buy With $3,000

It's time to increase your exposure to defensives!

Read more »