Vermilion Energy CEO Lorenzo Donadeo Sees No Relief For Canadian Energy Producers

Fool contributor Robert Baillieul talks shop with Vermilion Energy President and CEO, Lorenzo Donadeo. Part 2 of 3.

| More on:
The Motley Fool
You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s premium investing services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn moresdf

Do you hear that? That’s the sound a money slowly being drained from the coffers of Alberta’s energy industry.

Thanks to a shortage of transportation infrastructure, Canadian energy products are some of the cheapest in the world. Last year, Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver told an audience in New Brunswick that the discount for North American energy supplies was costing Canada “$50 million every single day —$18 to $19 billion every year.” And since then that figure has been revised higher.

In part two of my interview with Vermilion Energy (TSX:VET, NYSE:VET) Chief Executive Officer Lorenzo Donadeo, we discuss his outlook for energy prices and whether he sees any relief for North American oil and gas producers. Below is the transcript of our conversation; it has been lightly edited for clarity.

Robert Baillieul: Oil is trading at around a $10 to $30 per barrel discount to Brent depending on which benchmark you want to use. Alberta natural gas is going for $12 per thousand cubic feet discount to European benchmarks. From your perspective, will we see any relief in the near future for the North American energy industry? Do you see that discount narrowing any time soon?

Lorenzo Donadeo: Personally I don’t see it on the oil side.

Right now the cost of getting rail is about $17 per barrel and so as a result the way I look at it is our netback prices in Canada relative to Brent is going to reflect a $17 to $18 differentiate until such time as we get pipelines in the ground whether it’s Keystone, west to east, or [Northern] Gateway. But those projects are still two to three years out. I think we’re going to be seeing those discounts continue until then.

On the gas side I think this cold weather is here for a while. It has really supported gas prices and we’re really enjoying it right now. I’m not totally convinced that it’s going to be a sustainable price level over the longer term just because there’s just so much gas out there that people have put on the backburner when prices dropped off. When prices rise they’ll just ramp up production again and we’ll see gas prices range bound in the $4 to $5 range for the foreseeable future.

Baillieul: Yes, a quick look through the inventory reports show that there’s a lot of gas sitting in storage. I don’t want to put words in your mouth but in your previous conference call you listed a couple of bullish catalysts for European gas prices. Can you give a little colour on the market across the pond?

Donadeo: On the European side part of what has happened there is that the declines in the North Sea production have been more significant than originally anticipated. What’s happening is that the market share for both Norway and Russia is increasing from about 45% to about 55% over the next year. And as a result Russia has been very determined in terms of tieing their gas production to higher oil brent pricing. And this just really strengthens their negotiating power.

In addition to that Russia is constructing a major pipeline to China over the next couple of years where they’re going to have an alternative market for their supply that is going to consume significant volumes. As a result you’re going to see strong European gas prices. I’ve seen reports calling for gas prices to trade around the $11 to $13 range over the next several years.

Coming up next…
There’s a lot of media buzz about the emerging Duvernay shale field in northern Alberta. According to estimates from Alberta’s Geological Survey, the play could rival the infamous North Dakota Bakken. In part three of my conversation with Lorenzo, we discuss the prospects for the Duvernay and Vermilion operations in the field.

This article represents the opinion of the writer, who may disagree with the “official” recommendation position of a Motley Fool premium service or advisor. We’re Motley! Questioning an investing thesis — even one of our own — helps us all think critically about investing and make decisions that help us become smarter, happier, and richer, so we sometimes publish articles that may not be in line with recommendations, rankings or other content.

Fool Contributor Robert Baillieul has no positions in any of the companies mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares of Vermilion Energy.

More on Investing

Investing

KM Throwaway Post

Read more »

Investing

Carlos Test Yoast Metadata

Read more »

Investing

KM Ad Test

This is my excerpt.

Read more »

Investing

Test post for affiliate partner mockups

Updated: 9/17/2024. This post was not sponsored. The views and opinions expressed in this review are purely those of the…

Read more »

Investing

Testing Ecap Error

Premium content from Motley Fool Stock Advisor We here at Motley Fool Stock Advisor believe investors should own at least…

Read more »

Investing

TSX Today: Testing the Ad for James

la la la dee dah.

Read more »

Lady holding remote control pointed towards a TV
Investing

2 Streaming Stocks to Buy Now and 1 to Run From

There are streaming stocks on the TSX that are worth paying attention to in 2023 and beyond.

Read more »

A red umbrella stands higher than a crowd of black umbrellas.
Stocks for Beginners

Top Recession-Resilient TSX Stocks to Buy With $3,000

It's time to increase your exposure to defensives!

Read more »